Closed
Bug 1091069
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Progress bar has disappeared
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System::Browser Chrome, defect, P1)
Firefox OS Graveyard
Gaia::System::Browser Chrome
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:2.0M+, b2g-v2.0 unaffected, b2g-v2.0M unaffected, b2g-v2.1 verified, b2g-v2.2 verified)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v2.0 | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.0M | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.1 | --- | verified |
b2g-v2.2 | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: benfrancis, Assigned: apastor)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [systemsfe])
Attachments
(5 files)
STR:
* Tap browser icon
* Type a web address
* Hit enter
Expected:
* Progress bar shows that page is loading
Actual:
* A blank white space appears where the progress bar should be
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Alberto, could this have been caused by bug 1087042
QA, can we get a branch check please? I saw this on master but if this was bug 1087042 then it will reproduce on 2.1 too.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Looks like the progress bar does display in 2.1, but there is still a slightly empty white space when it is hidden.
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Issue is reproducible on Flame 2.2 master and Flame 2.1.
Observed behavior: No animated blue bar under the URL bar for the duration of loading a webpage. I had to flash to an earlier master build to look at how this bar looks like. Attaching a combined screenshot showing what this bar looks like and what the browser looks without it.
Device: Flame 2.2 Master (shallow flash)
BuildID: 20141029054810
Gaia: a9a847920b51b79c4ad4ad339f0a005777a6228c
Gecko: c6989e473f97
Version: 36.0a1 (2.2 Master)
Firmware: V188
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:36.0) Gecko/36.0 Firefox/36.0
Device: Flame 2.1 (shallow flash)
BuildID: 20141029082611
Gaia: 2099fb0df60548cf7d4afc367f5048622cc29b3e
Gecko: f02f3fbd0bb0
Version: 34.0 (2.1)
Firmware: V188
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:34.0) Gecko/34.0 Firefox/34.0
Not checking 2.0 because browser2/chrome browser is not implemented on 2.0.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Attaching a logcat as requested
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.2:
--- → affected
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Keywords: qawanted
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(jmitchell)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Is definetely a regression of 1087042. Working on it
Assignee: nobody → apastor
Flags: needinfo?(apastor)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Sorry about that. Forgot removing a class in the selector. At least this case will be covered now.. :)
Attachment #8513748 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]: Is a regression of a blocker. This should land in both branches
blocking-b2g: 2.2? → 2.1?
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8513748 [details]
Link to Pull Request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/25632
LGTM. Thanks.
Attachment #8513748 -
Flags: review?(kgrandon) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite+
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8513748 [details]
Link to Pull Request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/25632
[Approval Request Comment]
[Bug caused by] (feature/regressing bug #): 1087042
[User impact] if declined: The progressbar will be only visible in fullscreen apps
[Testing completed]: Added integration tests covering this case
[Risk to taking this patch] (and alternatives if risky): Low risk. Removed class in a css selector
[String changes made]: -
Attachment #8513748 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.1?(fabrice)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8513748 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.1?(fabrice) → approval-gaia-v2.1+
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Target Milestone: --- → 2.1 S8 (7Nov)
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
I'm seeing some intermittent failures for this still, I think this should clear some up.
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8514542 [details]
Test follow-up, adjust wait
Going to go r=me here as it's a simple testing follow-up.
Attachment #8514542 -
Flags: review+
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Testing follow-up in master: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/c544e4eb66d3ee43f0484ed30a7637586e03ea52
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Issue verified fixed on Flame 2.1 and Flame 2.2
Actual Results: Progress bar shows that page is loading
Device: Flame 2.1 (319mb)(Kitkat Base)(Full Flash)
BuildID: 20141031001201
Gaia: f89c7b12c36572262c9ea76058694a139b1a8634
Gecko: 50d48f8a04c7
Gonk: 48835395daa6a49b281db62c50805bd6ca24077e
Version: 34.0 (2.1)
Firmware: V188
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:34.0) Gecko/34.0 Firefox/34.0
Device: Flame 2.2 Master (319mb)(Kitkat Base)(Full Flash)
BuildID: 20141031061804
Gaia: a07994714f0552f89801d6097982308d8b0a1ee1
Gecko: 6bd2071b373f
Gonk: 48835395daa6a49b281db62c50805bd6ca24077e
Version: 36.0a1 (2.2)
Firmware Version: v188
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:36.0) Gecko/36.0 Firefox/36.0
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage+] → [QAnalyst-Triage?]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: Woodduck
blocking-b2g: 2.1+ → 2.0M+
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.0M:
--- → affected
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Kai-Zhen,
It is reported by partner as bug 1092009
Could you please help to land on 2.0M? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Alberto:
We need this patch to be uplifted on 2.0m. Do we need any rebased patch?
Thanks!!
Shawn
Flags: needinfo?(apastor)
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
@Alberto,
This is requested urgently by partner. Can you provide ETA date? Thanks!
Comment 21•10 years ago
|
||
I thought the devices team is taking care of landing the necessary patches on all the device specific 2.0 branches.
Flags: needinfo?(kkuo)
Flags: needinfo?(bbajaj)
Flags: needinfo?(apastor)
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gregor Wagner [:gwagner] from comment #21)
> I thought the devices team is taking care of landing the necessary patches
> on all the device specific 2.0 branches.
Hi! Gregor,
Shawn is asking Alberto that this patch, 25632, need to be rebased for 2.0 or not?
If no rebase needed, device team can uplift to 2.0m directly.
--
Keven
Flags: needinfo?(kkuo)
Comment 23•10 years ago
|
||
This patch was for the 2.1 system browser. If we are seeing this in 2.0 it's a different issue. This patch can not resolve something in 2.0 unless you uplift all of the system browser.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: Woodduck_Blocker
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Comment 24•10 years ago
|
||
We need a video or screenshot of this in 2.0.
Comment 25•10 years ago
|
||
NI Marigold QA Norry,
Please also attach reproduce video in this bug. Thank you!
Flags: needinfo?(fan.luo)
Comment 26•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Josh,
We can access this website below and the progress bar can work on Woodduck 2.0m and Flame 2.0
(Website: http://www.useragentman.com/blog/2012/01/03/cross-browser-html5-progress-bars-in-depth/, Maybe you should enter the website homepage http://www.useragentman.com/, and then tap the link:"Cross Browser HTML5 Progress Bars In Depth" to load the correct page.)
Flame 2.0 build:
Gaia-Rev fe2167fa5314c7e71c143a590914cbf3771905a8
Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/241e51806687
Build-ID 20141103160206
Version 32.0
Device-Name flame
FW-Release 4.4.2
FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20141103.194240
FW-Date Mon Nov 3 19:42:51 EST 2014
Bootloader L1TC00011880
----------------
Woodduck build:
Gaia-Rev dd7dc2002ee180e578d3a7898c9a856245019fff
Gecko-Rev ee1a5e900589cfb51827010127e24befbabd8043
Build-ID 20141104050313
Version 32.0
Device-Name soul35
FW-Release 4.4.2
FW-Incremental 1415048724
FW-Date Tue Nov 4 05:05:45 CST 2014
Flags: needinfo?(fan.luo) → needinfo?(jocheng)
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Comment 27•10 years ago
|
||
It seems like this is fine then per bug 1092009 comment 8.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(jocheng)
Reporter | ||
Comment 28•10 years ago
|
||
Should I file a separate bug for that?(In reply to Ben Francis [:benfrancis] from comment #2)
> Looks like the progress bar does display in 2.1, but there is still a
> slightly empty white space when it is hidden.
Still seeing this, filed bug 1096301
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(bbajaj)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: Woodduck_P2
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Updated•10 years ago
|
No longer blocks: Woodduck_P2
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•