DEFECT DESCRIPTION: the old APN is not overwritten by a new one which has the same name. REPRODUCING PROCEDURES: send a provision message to MS, which include the same name APN with the preconfigered one APN. like: when I insert a CMCC card to MS. then send a provison message which include a APN and the APN name is "CMNET" to MS.--KO >the new one does not overwritte the old one. EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: the new same name APN should overeritte the old one. ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION: TEST PLAN REFERENCE: TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED: USER IMPACT: REPRODUCING RATE: For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior: tel:0752+2639639

Hi Shawn, I wonder is this by design?

Dear Shawn, Is this by design?

I will claim this is by-design. But, more check is needed to see how Gaia get those values from db.

per issue review meeting: 1. this is a need for APN modification triggered from base station side, not from end user. 2. need related OMA spec. reference from partner for checking.

Per comment 4, please help provide OMA spec. for this requirement.

(In reply to comment #5) > Comment from Mozilla:Per comment 4, please help provide OMA spec. for this > requirement. Comment From VAL: 1）安卓上如果当前配置信息的APN名称与已存在的APN一样，安装后是会覆盖的。 2）目前没有找到相关的协议规定说明如果名称一样，新安装的APN要覆盖已存在的APN。 3）但是从用户的角度看，如果存在两个名称一样的APN，会引起用户疑惑，无法区分要使用哪个APN，这样用户体验不是很好。

Hi Reporter, Since there is no spec for this issue. We will claim this is by-design. Hi Gary, Can we provide suggestion for customer to customize this? Thanks!

(In reply to sync-1 from comment #6) > > Comment From VAL: > 2）目前没有找到相关的协议规定说明如果名称一样，新安装的APN要覆盖已存在的APN。 Hi reporter: Per issue review meeting yesterday w/ SWPM DengWei, he mentioned that he remembers there is such OMA spec. about related requirement, would you help double confirm w/ him? I guess there will be some clue in that part for everyone's reference. Thank you.

Unless there is a clear picture on spec., I don't think we should get this request done because APN name (which is not unique) could be modified by user them-self.

(In reply to comment #8) > Comment from Mozilla:(In reply to sync-1 from comment #6) > > > > Comment From VAL: > > 2）目前没有找到相关的协议规定说明如果名称一样，新安装的APN要覆盖已存在的APN。 > Hi reporter: > Per issue review meeting yesterday w/ SWPM DengWei, he mentioned that he > remembers there is such OMA spec. about related requirement, would you help > double confirm w/ him? I guess there will be some clue in that part for > everyone's reference. Thank you. He also can't find any OMA spec. Thanks!

Could you just make it like Android?

Per comment 9/10, Please downgrade the severity on 2.0m, we can check this feature in next version.

Dear Mozilla, If we want to make it like Android, where is the main code I should take care? Could you give me some advice. Thanks!