Open
Bug 1262352
(svg-enhance)
Opened 9 years ago
Updated 2 years ago
[META] tracking SVG enhancement
Categories
(Core :: SVG, enhancement)
Core
SVG
Tracking
()
NEW
People
(Reporter: bmo, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 10 open bugs)
Details
(Keywords: feature, meta)
A meta bug to track SVG enhancement provided by TPE layout team.
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
I'm not sure which kinds of bugs are meant to be covered by this one. Is it SVG 1.1 or SVG 2 or some specific ones you picked?
Note that for SVG 2 I've created an implementation status page:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/SVG_2_support_in_Mozilla
Also, if this issue doesn't cover SVG 2 support, would it be worth creating another meta-bug for all SVG 2 features?
Sebastian
Flags: needinfo?(aschen)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sebastian Zartner [:sebo] from comment #2)
> I'm not sure which kinds of bugs are meant to be covered by this one. Is it
> SVG 1.1 or SVG 2 or some specific ones you picked?
> Note that for SVG 2 I've created an implementation status page:
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/SVG_2_support_in_Mozilla
It's a meta bug to collect all good-{first|second}-bugs of SVG component that can help TPE layout team grow up the knowledge of this domain and as a track bug for progress control. It's not specific to any versions of SVG.
> Also, if this issue doesn't cover SVG 2 support, would it be worth creating
> another meta-bug for all SVG 2 features?
It doesn't cover any SVG2 support in this bug, I'll ni heycam here to see if we have had a bug for it. Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(aschen) → needinfo?(cam)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I don't think we have a bug to cover implementing SVG 2 as a whole. (I don't think we need one. We should evaluate SVG 2 features / bug fixes on a case by case basis.)
Flags: needinfo?(cam)
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Cameron McCormack (:heycam) from comment #4)
> I don't think we have a bug to cover implementing SVG 2 as a whole. (I
> don't think we need one. We should evaluate SVG 2 features / bug fixes on a
> case by case basis.)
Ok, if you change your mind at some point, I have created a public saved search for SVG 2 bugs now (based on the bugs listed on the MDN page). With that it should be easy to create a meta-bug.
Sebastian
Updated•9 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
/fwiw here's another instance. Compare
https://ello.co/ddailey/post/0h8y-ppuvw8-ke4zs5wqaw (embedded in HTML <img>)
vs
http://cs.sru.edu/%7Eddailey/svg/Vdub44cC.svg
The latter is the 'pure' image and the CSS animation works fine in FF, but not within <img> at Ello.
In Chrome and IE the CSS part of the animation works fine in both contexts. I assume this is no different than the other reports, though I'm not quite sure how to find my previously reported instance [sorry].
(In reply to david.dailey from comment #6)
> /fwiw here's another instance. Compare
> https://ello.co/ddailey/post/0h8y-ppuvw8-ke4zs5wqaw (embedded in HTML <img>)
> vs
> http://cs.sru.edu/%7Eddailey/svg/Vdub44cC.svg
> The latter is the 'pure' image and the CSS animation works fine in FF, but
> not within <img> at Ello.
> In Chrome and IE the CSS part of the animation works fine in both contexts.
> I assume this is no different than the other reports, though I'm not quite
> sure how to find my previously reported instance [sorry].
I will look into it while debugging bug 1190881, thank you for report this issue.
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•