Closed
Bug 1335
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 26 years ago
Search problems against Exchange LDAP servers
Categories
(Directory :: PerLDAP, defect, P2)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: leif, Assigned: leif)
Details
A number of reports have come in re: weird search problems against an Exchange
LDAP server. I don' tknow what is going on, and I need to get my hands on an
Exchange server (and/or an NT 5 box with Active Directory).
I'm attaching a couple of mail messages.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
Thank you for responding so quickly.
I am using the Netscape Directory SDK 3.0 for C Beta 1 which I
downloaded from the Netscape web site: http://developer.netscape.com/.
I am only using the SSL version because that is the only one that is
available to me over the internet. The memory usage during the hanging
search does not seem to go up.
The exact search I use for persons with a phone number of 2000 is as
follows:
ldapsearch -b "o=Mitel" -h PC345 -s subtree "telephoneNumber = 2000"
this search yields the following:
dn: cn=JoeB,cn=Recipients,ou=PC345D,o=Mitel
objectClass: organizationalPerson
objectClass: person
objectClass: Top
rdn: JoeB
cn: Joe Bofespon
distinguishedName: cn=JoeB,cn=Recipients,ou=PC345D,o=Mitel
rfc822Mailbox: JoeB@PC345D.Mitel.com
mail: JoeB@PC345D.Mitel.com
textEncodedORaddress: c=US;a= ;p=Mitel;o=PC345D;s=Bofespon;g=Joe;
description: 6263263426337766
description: 62632633563
givenName: Joe
uid: JoeB
MAPI-Recipient: TRUE
sn: Bofespon
facsimileTelephoneNumber: 4003
telephoneNumber: 2000
I use an identical search for Joe using his givenName attribute.
ldapsearch -b "o=Mitel" -h PC345 -s subtree "givenName=Joe"
That search hangs.
It seems if I search for pure numerical attributes such as description,
telephoneNumber and facsimileTelephoneNumber I get results returned.
However if I search for string type attributes, ldapsearch will hang and
never return. I find this odd since all documentation I have read
indicates that both telephoneNumber and givenName are stored as Unicode
strings in the Exchange server.
Does the fact that I am using the Netscape SDK with Exchange's LDAP
directory have anything to do with this? The exact searches I've
mentioned above work perfectly with version 1.0 of the Directory SDK.
I hope I have provided you with useful information.
Thanks in advance,
Mich
> ----------
> From: Leif Hedstrom[SMTP:leif@netscape.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 18, 1998 2:58 AM
> To: Kevin Tsurutome
> Cc: Crichton, Michel; Fletcher Jones
> Subject: Re: ldap with ssl version 3.0
>
>
> First, is your suffix really "" ? That won't work properly with new
> Netscape
> Directory servers for instance, since "" is a reserved suffix. In any
> case, I
> tried the command above (changing "-b" to use our suffix), and it
> certainly
> does return the entries I'd expect (I've tried the "ldapsearch" that
> ships
> with Netscape DS-3.1, and with DS-4.0, both worked fine). Also, you
> can leave
> out the -D and -w above, if you don't bind as a user, you are
> anonymous by
> default.
>
> Is your database very large? Could you possibly run into size limits?
> I
> assume you do have an an "eq" index on the givenName attribute? Is
> there
> anything in the error logs? Does the slapd process start using up a
> lot of
> CPU when the ldapsearch is running?
>
> Also, what exactly does this have to do with SSL? The call above
> clearly
> won't use SSL, since you haven't provided a cert DB file for the
> client to
> use. Perhaps you can explain your problem a little more in detail, and
> hopefully we can figure out where's it's going wrong.
>
> -- leif
>
>
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
That attachment was sent by "Crichton, Michel" <michel_crichton@Mitel.COM>
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•26 years ago
|
QA Contact: 3849
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
sent a request to michel_crichton@Mitel.COM to see if they can verify the fix.
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
received no response from originator of mailnote, asking Leif if he can verify.
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•26 years ago
|
||
We believe this was solved with anothe bug fix, I have no way of verifying this,
and I've not heard of any problems after the bug fix was done.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•