de.comp.os.ms-windows.misc
Re: Windows-Lizenz/Intel-Aufkleber entfernen Tue 5 July 2022 2028 (GMT+2)

Loading the message hangs. The C++ implementation shows:
Article not found
The newsgroup server reports that it can't find the article.
Newsgroup server responded: No such article number 216939
Perhaps the article has expired?
Try searching for article: <1pumyxy.3vm2d85c2tecN@ID-7682.user.dfncis.de> (216939)

Thanks, with the patch the said article now shows as "Article not found".

Pushed by nicolai@thunderbird.net:
https://hg.mozilla.org/comm-central/rev/e896d6f9826d
Show about:newserror for no article and other errors. r=darktrojan

Comment on attachment 9284261 [details]
Bug 1778229 - Show about:newserror for no article and other errors. r=#thunderbird-reviewers

Request for this and bug 1778474, which fix the tests.
[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): bug 1707550
User impact if declined: Expired message is shown as loading, but should show "no article" error
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): c-c
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low

Comment on attachment 9284261 [details]
Bug 1778229 - Show about:newserror for no article and other errors. r=#thunderbird-reviewers

[Triage Comment]
Approved for beta

Thunderbird 103.0b5:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-beta/rev/a6e9a0e83577

Comment on attachment 9284261 [details]
Bug 1778229 - Show about:newserror for no article and other errors. r=#thunderbird-reviewers

Request for this and bug 1778474, which fix the tests.
[Approval Request Comment]
Regression caused by (bug #): bug 1707550
User impact if declined: Expired message is shown as loading, but should show "no article" error
Testing completed (on c-c, etc.): beta
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): low

Comment on attachment 9284261 [details]
Bug 1778229 - Show about:newserror for no article and other errors. r=#thunderbird-reviewers

[Triage Comment]
Approved for esr102

Thunderbird 102.1.0:
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-esr102/rev/dedeac20c599

Uplifting this bug to 102.1 caused all sorts of problems.

It looks like bug 1778474, bug 1745033, and bug 1779865 should also be uplifted to handle the situation.

Have you tried uplifting bug 1778474 as well? I did mention it in comment 7.

I think bug 1745033 and bug 1779865 are separate, I will uplift them after 104.

(In reply to Ping Chen (:rnons) from comment #11)

Have you tried uplifting bug 1778474 as well? I did mention it in comment 7.
Comments are easy to miss, best to request uplift on additional bugs.