Closed
Bug 260135
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
when viewing message threads, the threads themselves should be sorted by last message in thread, not first message
Categories
(Thunderbird :: Mail Window Front End, enhancement)
Thunderbird
Mail Window Front End
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jonathan.payne, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10
One of the nicest things about google's gmail is that you can sort message
threads by the date of the last message in that thread. I think the mac os X
mail reader also does the same thing.
Using message threads is very convenient but it's a problem when new messages
come in to that thread and you don't see it because the thread is 5 pages up in
the message list window because the thread was started three days ago.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
When sorted by date, the most recent message in the thread *is* used; for the
other criteria, the topmost message is used. However, when reading in new
messages, the threads are not reordered dynamically (which I think is what
bug 207766 is about).
The easy workaround is to simply resort.
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•20 years ago
|
||
I did not realize that the correct way to turn on threads and maintain sorting
by date is to use View -> Sort -> Date and also have the Threaded option
selected. I've always just pressed the Thread column in the message list to
turn on threading, and I am still not entirely sure what that does ...
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•20 years ago
|
||
OK, so it's true, if you get new mail the threads stay the way they are, but if
you leave the mailbox and come back, the threads move around to their new
position based on the date of the last message in the thread.
And I see that the original response indicates that Order Received does not get
this special treatment, so now I am a sort-by-Date kind of guy ...
This is almost perfect but if possible I would like an option to resort the
threads when new mail comes in. I think that as long as the current message is
still selected after the resorting, then I will not mind that I might be moved
around in my message list in some potentially dramatic ways.
Now it's up to "the powers that be" to decide whether this option would be
acceptable and whether it's pretty easy to implement.
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
After email discussion with reporter, => WFM
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
agree with reporter - threaded view is not usable unless new messages appear at
the top. Please see gmail for a successful implementation of threading.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•