Closed
Bug 262777
Opened 20 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
sort by date is ineffective against forged headers, sort by order recieved places messages moved between folders to bottom of list
Categories
(Thunderbird :: General, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 216033
People
(Reporter: robfarmer, Assigned: mscott)
Details
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Firefox/0.10
Several incoming messages from various sources do not have accurate dates in the
headers, which seems to be what is used for sorting when sort by date is
selected. When new messages come in w/ older than current date, they are placed
further back in inbox, mixed in with genuine old messages. Using sort by order
recieved fixes this problem for the inbox, however then when moving messages
between folders, these messages always appear at the bottom, rather than in the
order by date (which is to be expected, I suppose). I have used other email
clients (notably outlook) which seem to handle this without problems; i.e. new
messages do not appear mixed in with older messages.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set inbox to Sort by date & get new mail
2. New mail with wrong date information is mixed with genuine old mail
3. Move messages to subfolder, with a newer message being moved before an older
message
Actual Results:
The inbox is correctly ordered, however the subfolders and/or any folder where
messages have been moved to place the moved message at the bottom due to being
sorted by order recieved.
Expected Results:
Similar behavior to Outlook, where incoming messages appear in the correct order
(apparently even if date is forged), and yet when moving messages between
folders the order is maintained. No need to use "order recieved" for sorting.
I do not know the exact technical reason for this behavior, and it would more be
an enhancement of the current sorting methods.
Comment 1•20 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 216033 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•