Closed
Bug 3131
Opened 27 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
DNS: SOCKS: SGI: Horrendous DNS-related delays
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: sgidev, Assigned: var)
Details
(This bug imported from BugSplat, Netscape's internal bugsystem. It
was known there as bug #98017
http://scopus.netscape.com/bugsplat/show_bug.cgi?id=98017
Imported into Bugzilla on 02/11/99 19:49)
-- Bugs reported from SGI -
4.03 RTM - Horrendous DNS-related delays
Basically, despite the so-called "fix" of having DNS lookups
in a separate helper process, Navigator still hangs (no screen
updates in *any* window, incl. news/mail) for
up to several *minutes* when doing some DNS lookups.
These are not always failures, in fact they are usually
perfectly good domain names. There is no pattern to when
it will hang, but it seems to happen often. I end up having to kill the
netscape process after 2-3 minutes.
As far as I am concerned this makes the product basically
unusable, and would give up on it,
except that it is just as bad in previous versions.
---
When user change proxy configuration from
"Automatic" to "Manual", it provides a vast improvement.
Netscape does *not* hang in all
windows during delayed DNS queries. The browser window that
caused the delayed query is redrawn and you usually can use the
Stop button; other windows are normal.
---
This problem still occurs in 4.04 RTM. Would like to see it being fixed for
4.05.
Can anything be fixed for "Automatic" proxy configuration in 4.05?
Please give some feedback on this bug report once you have investigated further.
We need to find out:
1) Fix is easy, no side-effect.
2) Fix is hard, but there is a work around.
3) Fix need to be on SGI setup. Give suggestions.
This is not a taker for 4.05 In yet. We need to have some investigation done
first.
Reassign to Arun. He is interested in this problem.
Adding jwz,montulli,friedman and dp to the bug report for input.
Comment 2•27 years ago
|
||
adding valeski to cc list.
will most likely have to move this to target fix version 4.06 unless
we learn what the problem is and find an safe fix in the next couple of days.
Comment 3•27 years ago
|
||
adding valeski to cc list.
will most likely have to move this to target fix version 4.06 unless
we learn what the problem is and find an safe fix in the next couple of days.
Comment 4•27 years ago
|
||
Where is the automatic config url pointing? And/or what does the pac file look
like that the automatic config url points to?
Comment 5•27 years ago
|
||
There is some information about the SGI configuration at
http://grok/escalations/sgi/sgiconfig.htm
with a link to the most updated copy of the SGI doc at the bottom.
I suspect that the problems have something to do with SOCKS_NS settings.
Found a bunch of Linux guys also complaining about SOCKS_NS (a dejanews
search brings them up) and resulting DNS hangs.
dns_socks_kludge in unix-dns.c seems to be relevant. Is SGI using socks
version 4 or version 5 ?
Comment 7•27 years ago
|
||
umesh/alistair/var, can you track down the SOCKS version number?
Comment 8•27 years ago
|
||
no update from SGI.
we suspect this is a problem in there network config.
moving off the 4.05 to 4.06 until we learn more.
I finally got the answer from SGI today. They are using SOCKS version 4.
Comment 10•27 years ago
|
||
If they're using SOCKS version 4, everything should work in theory.
They need to set SOCKS_NS variable, only if there is a firewall
between their network and the DNS servers.
If nothing else works, we could give them a copy of 4.0x client
with the DNS trace output turned on to learn more about what's
going on.
Comment 11•26 years ago
|
||
Reassign to web group for them to find an owner of this bug.
Comment 12•26 years ago
|
||
Chris, please find a new owner to really look into this problem.
Comment 13•26 years ago
|
||
Changing TFV to 5.0.
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: mcafee → spence
Hardware: All
Comment 14•26 years ago
|
||
Another one for Spence!
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: spence → gagan
Comment 15•26 years ago
|
||
this is a really old and crusty bug, any idea whether it's still
relevant? if so, do we have the same problems in seamonkey?
Comment 16•26 years ago
|
||
If this is indeed TFV/5.0 then who is handling our SGI builds? Are we still
supporting it? Last I heard from akkana, people at SGI are trying to maintain
SGI builds... Marking LATER for now.
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: gagan → var
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Comment 17•26 years ago
|
||
lets try var@sgi.com
Comment 18•26 years ago
|
||
Note that this is a problem on the old 4.x codebase, may or may not have
anything to do with the new codebase.
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 19•26 years ago
|
||
SGI entered this bug against Communicator 4.03 back in
Sep 24 1997 03:42:24PM then escalated it to Netscape's defect bug
system. Then it got LATER'ed to 5.0 so is now assigned back to SGI
to fix in the 5.0 code... I guess it would be OK for us to accept
this bug. The only problem is that the 5.0 code hasn't been stable
enough on IRIX for us to delve into fixing bugs like this yet so
it may take a while to resolve this bug. For SGI purposes this is
bug id 528097.
Victor A. Riley
Comment 20•26 years ago
|
||
per leger, assigning QA contacts to all open bugs without QA contacts according
to list at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
Comment 21•25 years ago
|
||
Changing all Networking Library/Browser bugs to Networking-Core component for
Browser.
Occasionally, Bugzilla will burp and cause Verified bugs to reopen when I do
this in a bulk change. If this happens, I will fix. ;-)
Comment 22•25 years ago
|
||
Bulk move of all Networking-Core (to be deleted component) bugs to new
Networking component.
Comment 23•25 years ago
|
||
Cleared the resolution. (Bugzilla no longer supports the idea that an open bug
can have any kind of resolution set.)
Resolution: LATER → ---
Comment 24•25 years ago
|
||
spam, changing qa contact from paulmac to tever@netscape.com on networking/RDF
bugs
QA Contact: paulmac → tever
Comment 25•24 years ago
|
||
This bug has not been touched for more than nine months. In most cases, that
means it has "slipped through the net". Please could the owner take a moment to
add a comment to the bug with current status, and/or close it.
Thank you :-)
Gerv
Comment 26•24 years ago
|
||
should leave this one alone. if someone comes back to work
on the sgi port they could pick up on the work
Comment 28•23 years ago
|
||
RESOLVED/INVALID
per jaworski, this can be wrapped up.
There is no complete problem description, esp the offending .pac file.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago → 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Comment 29•22 years ago
|
||
VERIFIED:
looking more carefully at this, we also have completely new SOCKS code now.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Keywords: verifyme
Summary: SGI: Horrendous DNS-related delays → DNS: SOCKS: SGI: Horrendous DNS-related delays
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•