I can not load a single url with today's build (1.5a rv:1.9a1 build 2006031708) under XP Pro SP2. As the software is started for the first time, the javascript console will report these warnings: Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\BrandRes.dll Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\fullsoft.dll Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\master.ini Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\myspell\en-US.aff Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\myspell\en-US.dic Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\talkback-l10n.ini Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\talkback.cnt Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\talkback.exe Failed to load XPCOM component: C:\Program Files\mozilla.org\SeaMonkey\components\talkback.hlp Steps to reproduce: download build 2006031708 Setting severity: Blocker CONFIRMING

[ ] seamonkey-1.5a.en-US.win32.stub-installer.exe 17-Mar-2006 18:23 255K works for me Did you use the full installer (12MB) or the ZIP file?

> Did you use the full installer (12MB) Good question! Yes, I used the full installer: 12,228 KB

ZIP file is working: 1.9a1: 2006031708 Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.9a1) Gecko/20060317 SeaMonkey/1.5a

I uninstalled build 2006031708 and downloaded the full installer (12,225 KB) of build 2006031809 and was able to load URLs without a problem. I may have wrongly set a setting on my firewall for build 2006031708... I'm not sure. But, with build 2006031809, I still get each and all of the messages of failures XPCOM components. So, I will resummarize this bugfile if I can't find a duplicate, otherwise, I will resolve this bugfile as WORKSFORME.

Bug 324252 ! I'm resolving this bug as DUPLICATE of bug 324252. I will attach a screenshot over there. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 324252 ***

V.Duplicate