Closed
Bug 41456
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Date tooltip when using scrollbar in mail/news
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: MailNews: Message Display, enhancement)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: bugzilla, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
image/gif
|
Details |
Just found this *very* cool little feature in Outlook Express.
When you use the scrollbar to scroll up and down in mail folders and newsgroups
the date for the posting/message at the top of the current visible page is shown
as a tooltip of the scrollbar.
A cool feature the I would love mozilla to have.
I've attached a image showing the feature in Outlook Express
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•25 years ago
|
||
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → M20
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
This feature is on the bloaty side. It could be useful for the History sidebar
as well as for the Mail thread pane, though.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Bah. As long as we have live scrolling, this is completely unnecessary. You can
get a much better idea of what is in the scrolled view of the thread pane by
actually looking at the scrolled view of the thread pane.
acrobat or wordperfect or word or someone shows what page you're on as you
scroll through documents. I just don't know if dates are useful. what does it
shouw if you sort on some other field?
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
`For instance, Word has a spiffy non-standard scroll bar that uses yellow
tooltips to tell you which part of the document you'll be looking at when you
release the mouse button. In contrast, the Finder and other good Mac applications
scroll the document as you drag the scroll thumb so that such indicators are
useless -- you *know* where you'll be when you release the mouse button because
you're *already* there.' -- <http://atpm.com/5.12/paradigm.shtml>
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
> As long as we have live scrolling, this is completely unnecessary.
So we should fix bug 63949 and/or the tree-scrolling perf problems instead?
Makes sense to me, since adding a tooltip would make scrolling perf worse than
it currently is.
warpozio@yahoo.com: did you look at that bug? it's resolved as wontfix. (it
happens to be wontfixed because it was replaced.)
fwiw a minor datapoint, i have 24,000 unread messages (mozilla is using 215mb of
ram, 237mb of vm, and the inbox itself is about 600mb) and i can scroll through
my inbox (sorted by date) w/o much issue.
henrik: what does it do if you sort by sender or receiver?
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Updated•17 years ago
|
Assignee: scottputterman → mail
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P3 → --
QA Contact: nbaca
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Comment 10•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Status: NEW → UNCONFIRMED
Comment 11•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 14•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 15•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 16•15 years ago
|
||
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but has been without a comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project. This means that it was logged against the old Mozilla suite and we cannot determine that it's still valid for the current SeaMonkey suite. Because of this, we are setting it to an UNCONFIRMED state.
If you can confirm that this report still applies to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it back to the NEW state along with a comment on how you reproduced it on what Build ID, or if it's an enhancement request, why it's still worth implementing and in what way.
If you can confirm that the report doesn't apply to current SeaMonkey 2.x nightly builds, please set it to the appropriate RESOLVED state (WORKSFORME, INVALID, WONTFIX, or similar).
If no action happens within the next few months, we move this bug report to an EXPIRED state.
Query tag for this change: mass-UNCONFIRM-20090614
Comment 17•15 years ago
|
||
MASS-CHANGE:
This bug report is registered in the SeaMonkey product, but still has no comment since the inception of the SeaMonkey project 5 years ago.
Because of this, we're resolving the bug as EXPIRED.
If you still can reproduce the bug on SeaMonkey 2 or otherwise think it's still valid, please REOPEN it and if it is a platform or toolkit issue, move it to the according component.
Query tag for this change: EXPIRED-20100420
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → EXPIRED
Comment 18•14 years ago
|
||
Not fixing this, may be done by an extension, though.
Resolution: EXPIRED → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•