Closed
Bug 4280
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 20 years ago
User can launch multiple instances of CCK Wizard.
Categories
(CCK Graveyard :: CCK-Wizard, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
mozilla1.2
People
(Reporter: bmartin, Assigned: shrutiv)
References
Details
Latest CCK Wizard
Double click on the RunWizard.exe, to launch the CCK Wizard
After Wizard is running, double-click the RunWizard.exe again.
Results:
users can launch multiple instances of CCK Wizard.
Expected result:
A message should display stating that only one instance of CCK Wizard can be
run.
Updated•26 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P3
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
I don't see this as an urgent bug.
I can get it to crash fairly simply if I start launching multiple Wizards.
Which would be easier: fixing the crash or just allowing one instance of the
wizard?
I thing we should assume the less permutations the customer has the better
chance we, SQA, has of releasing a quality product. Seems to me the wizard is
alreay a permuation nightmare as it is...why complicate it further?
Bumping back to P2.
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
Bulk move to M11.
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
Bulk move to post-beta1.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Severity: normal → enhancement
Priority: P2 → P3
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
This doesn't fail or cause crashes anymore. I'd like to close this as wontfix.
Objections?
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
Allowing/testing for multiple instances of CCK can get complicated. What if a
person is using two different CCK instances on the same configuration? Which
one would override the other? Also, what if the end user runs the build process
at the same time on the same configuration? Will there be a permission error?
If the build process took 10 or more minutes, I could see the need to trigger
multiple builds to save time. However, I believe it only takes a few minutes so
I do not see the need to support multiple instances.
Also, the more important question has been already asked in this thread. Is it
easier to enforce a single instance or support multiple instances? Our customer
only needs one instance.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → LATER
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
It is considerably difficult to implement the single instance alone. Windows
default is multiple and the way around this is a bit too laborious for us to try
and handle right now- am marking it as Later.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
Agreed. Not worth spending cycles on this until the CCK tool is 99% completed.
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Reopening so it doesn't get put by the wayside. This is currently marked M15
Comment 14•25 years ago
|
||
Marking as LATER
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 25 years ago
Resolution: --- → LATER
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Re-opening this for re-evaluation. May need invalid or wontfix resolution.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: LATER → ---
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Marking as Future
Sorry for not doing this earlier
Status: REOPENED → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M20 → Future
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
changing varada's bugs to shrutiv for CCK
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
marking P2, reassigning to shrutiv; only one instance should be allowed
Assignee: varada → shrutiv
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Priority: P3 → P2
Assignee | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•23 years ago
|
QA Contact: blee → jimmyu
Comment 20•23 years ago
|
||
Updating QA contact to jimmyu for half of the CCK bugs, while Bom-shik is gone.
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Priority: P2 → P3
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Future → ---
Assignee | ||
Updated•23 years ago
|
Severity: enhancement → normal
Comment 22•20 years ago
|
||
Old CCK.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•