Closed
Bug 553651
Opened 15 years ago
Closed 15 years ago
Enabled personas in addons manager will not update buttons of unused personas
Categories
(Toolkit :: Add-ons Manager, defect, P1)
Toolkit
Add-ons Manager
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla1.9.3a5
People
(Reporter: tchung, Assigned: Unfocused)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [rewrite])
Attachments
(1 file)
|
(deleted),
image/png
|
Details |
Enabled Persona screenshot
When enabling a new persona over updating an older persona, the status of the older persona should reflect its no longer being used. (eg. reshow the "Enable", "Remove" buttons)
See screenshot
Repro:
1) install addons branch build: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.3a4pre) Gecko/20100319 Minefield/3.7a4pre
2) open addons manager
3) install 2 or more personas via getpersonas.com
4) Verify back in Appearance pane, switching between the installed personas will not update the older persona's status. (like buttons)
Expected:
- Updating a persona should handle the older persona's status
Actual:
- Updating a new persona will not reflect the status of the older persons
|
Assignee | |
Updated•15 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 1•15 years ago
|
||
HM, I wonder if this is an API issue with the personas provider. Will investigate.
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 2•15 years ago
|
||
Nope, definitely a UI issue.
http://hg.mozilla.org/projects/addonsmgr/rev/5ab876c3693a
Whiteboard: [rewrite] → [rewrite][fixed-in-addonsmgr]
|
||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → bmcbride
Flags: in-testsuite?
Flags: in-litmus?
Version: unspecified → Trunk
|
||
Comment 3•15 years ago
|
||
Landed on trunk as a part of bug 554007
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 15 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [rewrite][fixed-in-addonsmgr] → [rewrite]
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.9.3a5
|
|
||
Comment 4•15 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed on all platforms like Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.3a5pre) Gecko/20100511 Minefield/3.7a5pre ID:20100511030640
Blair, I would assume that can be completely covered by an automated test?
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 5•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #4)
> Blair, I would assume that can be completely covered by an automated test?
Yes.
|
|
||
Updated•15 years ago
|
Flags: in-litmus? → in-litmus-
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•