Closed
Bug 56882
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
NS6: no scrollbar when viewing indiv. search engine results after performing aggregate search
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P2)
Tracking
()
mozilla0.9
People
(Reporter: lynnw, Assigned: buster)
References
Details
(Keywords: testcase, Whiteboard: [rtm-])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
text/html
|
Details |
When user performs aggregate search, no scrollbar is available when the user
views the result pages for the individual search engines.
Steps to reproduce:
1. select two or more search engines from the sidebar search panel.
2. enter search query in sidebar and click on Search button
3. In the main browser window, select a search engine by clicking on the
corresponding button.
4. Note that you can see the results page, but that you cannot scroll down the
list because the scrollbar is missing on the right-hand side of the browser
window.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Multi-engine searchs are currently broken and its being tracked in bug # 55277
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 55277 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
I wouldn't exactly call this a dupe and I'd like to see the fix for that bug first. This bug
is one level deeper and it's not a matter of course to assume one fixes the other.
Of course you may very well fix this while fixing that. That's just fixing two bugs though,
not the same bug twice (ie a duplicate).
I'm going to reopen this and jsut sit and wait for 55277.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Updated•24 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [rtm-]
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Duplicate or not, bug 55277 has been minused so I guess this one should be too.
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Probably just needs a CSS tweak... Ben?
Assignee: rjc → ben
Status: REOPENED → NEW
Whiteboard: [rtm-]
Ouch. Ben, have a look see at this puppy ...
Whiteboard: [rtm need info]
Sigh. At this point in the RTM cycle I'm gonna have to minus this. If anyone
comes up with a patch, please clear the minus.
Whiteboard: [rtm need info] → [rtm-]
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
I don't think this is an XPApps bug.
Here's what we do:
var doc = frames[0].document;
doc.open("text/html", "replace");
doc.writeln(text);
doc.close();
which is fine. It seems that if you use doc.writeIn to write in enough content
such that a scroll is required, the scrollbar won't properly appear. Seems
like a layout bug, punt back if you disagree. I'll attach a testcase.
Assignee: blakeross → clayton
Component: Search → Layout
QA Contact: claudius → petersen
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 57974 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Assignee | ||
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
two comments:
1) I've seen other bugs like this, where js-written content fails to produce a
scrollbar.
2) I tried the steps to reproduce, and I got scrollbars. On WinNT, using
20001106 rtm candidate build.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 58833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
Testcase fails for me. WinNT build 20001128
Found this while investigating a similar bug. The test case here is exactly what
I'm seeing: writing to the document will not trigger a scroll bar when needed.
This occurs in both frames and opened windows.
Resizing does not pick up the new document size either. Apparently no way to get
the scrollbar to appear.
Comment 16•24 years ago
|
||
Upon managerial request, adding the "testcase" keyword to 84 open layout bugs that
do not have the "testcase" keyword and yet have an attachement with the word
"test" in the description field. Apologies for any mistakes.
Keywords: testcase
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
probably a duplicate of bug 55334
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla0.9
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
Defintely a dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 55334 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 20•24 years ago
|
||
Verifications. Tests (if necessary) were done with 2001052504 on Windows 2000.
Please forgive the spam.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•