Closed
Bug 57119
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
<OPTION> not taken in <SELECT> on the first load of a page
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: mozbug, Assigned: rods)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
Build 2000101720 Mtrunk
At the url, you'll see a drop down listbox.
Most of the time, some <OPTION> are not taken as part of the <SELECT> on the
first load of the page.
Strangely, if you reload the page, everything is ok.
I attach two screen captures (first load and after reload).
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
I did see it once on the page listed above, but have been unable to reporduce it
in a test case. I have also been unable to reproduce it at the URL listed above
since that one time.
This is with 2000101704 on Win98 and Win2K
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
Confirming on Linux with build 2000101712. Setting to OS->All and marking NEW.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows NT → All
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
Rod I did you a favor... :-)
I see it in win build 2000101709 but I'd be willing to bet that this is caused
by the really, really bad html coding...
I did a quick mock "cleaner" version. I'll add it as test case.
No problems in cleaner version. Suggest wont fix because it is clearly caused by
BAD markup.
Comment 7•24 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
This is actually a dup of a bug harishd fixed last week. I'll mark this one
works for me on trunk and branch
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
I am not sure if they changed the site, but i am notseeing the bad mark up and I
am not seeing the problem, if works for me is wrong, then please change it to
invalid or won't fix. James, thanks for the help.
Reporter | ||
Updated•24 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
Reported once more in bug 60301.
Since there is a test case there, I'd say we mark this one as a dup of 60301.
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•24 years ago
|
||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 60301 ***
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago → 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•