Closed
Bug 692775
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
Failure in testDisableEnablePlugin | controller.waitForEval: Timeout exceeded
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: remus.pop, Assigned: vladmaniac)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure][mozmill-test-skipped])
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
TEST: /testAddons/testDisableEnablePlugin
ERROR: controller.waitForEval: Timeout exceeded for 'subject.plugin.getPluginState(subject.node, subject.value) == subject.state'
WHEN: 2011-10-07
FIRST: 2011-08-20
BRANCHES: 1.9.2
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
A Pivotal Tracker story has been created: https://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/19393443
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
This skips the test.
Attachment #565524 -
Flags: review?(vlad.mozbugs)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 565524 [details] [diff] [review]
skip test (1.9.2) [checked-in]
Looks fine
Attachment #565524 -
Flags: review?(vlad.mozbugs) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
Attachment #565524 -
Flags: review+ → review?(anthony.s.hughes)
Attachment #565524 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes) → review+
Comment on attachment 565524 [details] [diff] [review]
skip test (1.9.2) [checked-in]
Landed:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/c0b27bf636ab (mozilla-1.9.2)
Attachment #565524 -
Attachment description: skip test (1.9.2) → skip test (1.9.2) [checked-in]
Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure] → [mozmill-test-failure][mozmill-test-skipped]
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
This is for 1.9.2 branch and with the new refactoring we'll drop Mozmill support for 1.9.2
However, waitForEval can be changed with waitFor to fix this test - should we have a fix patch or just close the bug?
Comment 6•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Maniac Vlad Florin (:vladmaniac) from comment #5)
> This is for 1.9.2 branch and with the new refactoring we'll drop Mozmill
> support for 1.9.2
What? Who said that we drop support for 1.9.2?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #6)
> (In reply to Maniac Vlad Florin (:vladmaniac) from comment #5)
> > This is for 1.9.2 branch and with the new refactoring we'll drop Mozmill
> > support for 1.9.2
>
> What? Who said that we drop support for 1.9.2?
There was a discussion on the mailing list about it some time ago I'll have to check and get back to you
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
We are going to drop support only on master so an easy fix would apply here .
Assignee: nobody → vlad.mozbugs
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•13 years ago
|
||
Changed waitForEval with waitFor in addons.js on mozilla-1.9.2 branch
This was not covered by Remus's refactoring waitFor patch for shared modules.
Also, re-enabled the test by deleting the skip lines.
Attachment #565524 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #588021 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes)
Comment 10•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Maniac Vlad Florin (:vladmaniac) from comment #9)
> This was not covered by Remus's refactoring waitFor patch for shared
> modules.
We have not landed the patch for shared modules on 1.9.2 yet. So not sure if that would make this patch obsolete later today.
Comment 11•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #10)
> (In reply to Maniac Vlad Florin (:vladmaniac) from comment #9)
> > This was not covered by Remus's refactoring waitFor patch for shared
> > modules.
>
> We have not landed the patch for shared modules on 1.9.2 yet. So not sure if
> that would make this patch obsolete later today.
Can you please clarify this statement Henrik? Does this mean that 1.9.2 does not have access to waitFor() and will not until the Shared Modules refactor patch lands? Thanks
Comment 12•13 years ago
|
||
It has but I'm waiting for the backport from Remus. Both patches would be in conflict.
Comment 13•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #12)
> It has but I'm waiting for the backport from Remus. Both patches would be in
> conflict.
You mean Remus' tests refactor patch or is there a separate patch for shared modules I am unaware of?
Comment 14•13 years ago
|
||
Yes, it is bug 714802.
Comment 15•13 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 588021 [details] [diff] [review]
quickfix patch v1.0
(In reply to Henrik Skupin (:whimboo) from comment #14)
> Yes, it is bug 714802.
Thanks Henrik; adding dependency.
Vlad, please retest and renominate for review after the 1.9.2 patch for bug 714802 has landed. Thanks
Attachment #588021 -
Flags: review?(anthony.s.hughes)
Comment 16•13 years ago
|
||
Since Firefox 3.6 will be EOL soon, resolving this bug WONTFIX.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•