I open this bug to create a test generated from our operator dictionary, for verifying stretchy and large operators. Unfortunately, it seems that the dynamically generated content is not well rendered, so I 'll give a static version of the test page.

Comment on attachment 579433 [details] [diff] [review] Patch I ask a review now, since fixing the issue with dynamically generated content seems out of the scope of this bug.

Comment on attachment 579433 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Looks good thanks. Some things to consider as possible future improvements: updateOperatorDictionary.pl would be easier to follow if the array index constants were names, or, perhaps simpler, the data could be collected into hash tables with the keys being 'description', 'lspace', etc. I wonder whether it would be worthwhile considering operators that are stretchy (have a direction) but are not stretchy by default. e.g. &Sum.