It's an implementation detail that should not live in a public iface.

Can't I just make this a dupe of 71482? :)

eh, screw it. I have an API fix that I'm going to roll into this.

I'll clean up the comment for isVisited() I removed the whole referrer thing because nobody seems to actually use it (yet) at some point we'll probably set that information at the same time we set the page title, so for now I'll leave it alone in the database.

nice! r=valeski.

actually, r=valeski after a comment on IsVisited(). Maybe point it back to AddPage() w/ something like. IsVisited() returns TRUE if a page had been passed into AddPage(). If the string passed into IsVisited was never passed into AddPage(), return FALSE.

sr=shaver

oops, I forgot that checked this in.

mass-verifying claudius' Fixed bugs which haven't changed since 2001.12.31. if you think this particular bug is not fixed, please make sure of the following before reopening: a. retest with a *recent* trunk build. b. query bugzilla to see if there's an existing, open bug (new, reopened, assigned) that covers your issue. c. if this does need to be reopened, make sure there are specific steps to reproduce (unless already provided and up-to-date). thanks! [set your search string in mail to "AmbassadorKoshNaranek" to filter out these messages.]