Closed
Bug 734737
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Firefox too I/O heavy on startup
Categories
(Firefox :: General, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 765351
People
(Reporter: marco, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [Snappy])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
application/x-7z-compressed
|
Details |
Firefox cold startup times are huge when other I/O heavy applications are running. We should improve how Firefox does I/O at startup.
I've attached a procmon log of a cold startup.
Clearly visible slow tasks are loading XUL.dll, loading fonts, loading dwrite. I know there are known issues related to fonts and dwrite.
With other I/O heavy applications running:
Cold startup - ~2 minutes
Hot startup - ~12 seconds
Without other I/O heavy applications running:
Cold startup - ~30 seconds
Hot startup - ~6 seconds
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
I'll investigate with xperf as soon as 692255 lands.
Updated•13 years ago
|
Component: Untriaged → General
QA Contact: untriaged → general
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [Snappy]
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Marco i think this is a dupe of bug 765351.
Once that bug lands we can track how much IO firefox does and try to make it better. In general Firefox has to do a lot of IO to load the large xul.dll file. bug 662397 will help with that.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Taras Glek (:taras) from comment #3)
> Marco i think this is a dupe of bug 765351.
> Once that bug lands we can track how much IO firefox does and try to make it better.
Definitely. And hopefully also the slowstartup addon will help us understand that.
I'll try to figure out if there's a problem with something in particular and in that case open a new bug.
(In reply to Taras Glek (:taras) from comment #3)
> In general Firefox has to do a lot of IO to load the large xul.dll
> file. bug 662397 will help with that.
I hope bug 662397 will be fixed soon, I think a lot of people take startup time as a measure of browsers' speed and we're really behind the others there.
Is there a bug to track startup wins? (bug 447581 is a little out of date).
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
I don't believe that we are behind. From our(and Tom's hardware) testing modern browsers all start slowly. There are annoying outliers in issues like responsiveness during startup + loading pages before showing window, but we are making progress on those.
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Taras Glek (:taras) from comment #5)
> I don't believe that we are behind. From our(and Tom's hardware) testing
> modern browsers all start slowly. There are annoying outliers in issues like
> responsiveness during startup + loading pages before showing window, but we
> are making progress on those.
Sorry, let me correct. We are behind in startup times in the situations described in my first comment, that is when other IO heavy software is running (or when the HDD is slow).
So when you execute the browser soon after Windows startup, it takes a lot of time to open (at least this is the behaviour I see on my PCs).
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•