Closed
Bug 909
Opened 26 years ago
Closed 26 years ago
Confusing dialog box
Categories
(SeaMonkey :: Passwords & Permissions, defect, P4)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: bryce, Assigned: morse)
Details
(Whiteboard: waiting for UI)
Not sure if I got the right "Component"...
Mozilla has a very nice feature (I think it's new...) where it saves the
username and password for login sites. It works well, but one of the
confirmation dialogs is worded in a confusing manner:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation Dialog
Do you want to save the username and password contained on this form?
[X] If not, do you want to remember this decision?
[ OK ] [ Cancel ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
It's very unclear what's going on here. I have no idea what the check box is
supposed to do. If I understand the purpose of this dialog box, might something
like this be clearer:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation Dialog
Do you want to save the username and password for this form?
[ ] Do not ask when viewing this page in the future.
[ OK ] [ Cancel ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
or even:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confirmation Dialog
Do you want to save the username and password for this form?
[ Yes ] [ Skip ] [ Never ] [ Help ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: montulli → dp
Comment 1•26 years ago
|
||
giving to dp
Updated•26 years ago
|
Assignee: dp → morse
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•26 years ago
|
QA Contact: 3819
Comment 2•26 years ago
|
||
per leger, assigning QA contacts to all open bugs without QA contacts according
to list at http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Browser
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•26 years ago
|
||
Good suggestion. However, the wording cannot be "Do not ask when viewing this
page in the future" because we must always ask if the user says he wants to save
it (otherwise we would have a security breach on a machine in a shared
environment). So the wording on the second message will be changed to "Never
save when viewing this page in the future."
Assignee | ||
Updated•26 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 26 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•26 years ago
|
Whiteboard: waiting for UI
Comment 4•26 years ago
|
||
will verify when the UI is available
Comment 5•25 years ago
|
||
While attempting to verify this bug, I noticed that the statement in question no
longer exists (the part about never saving). Is this part no longer relevant? Or
are we just no longer asking, or...
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•25 years ago
|
||
If the user logs into a site and doesn't want us to save his password, he
probably never wants his password saved for that site. So once he gives a
negative answer we will automatically remember it for that site. This avoids
the confusing checkbox and simplifies the user's experience.
This might have been a bad decision and perhaps we should resurect the checkbox
with the wording "Never save for this site". This is what is currently done for
wallet. Still a bit confusing because if the checkbox is checked and he presses
OK we ignore the checkbox since it's a meaningless combination (how could he say
"never save for this site" but at the same time be saying "save it this time").
If you think we should resurect the checkbox (at the very least it will be
consistent with wallet), then reopen this bug report. The change in the code is
trivial.
Comment 7•25 years ago
|
||
I think a simple user experience is better, probably.
What are the odds that a user could delete a site from the 'Don't Remember List'
using the Display Signon Viewer?
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•25 years ago
|
||
Your question is ambiguous. Are you asking the odds that we can implement the
signon viewer to have this ability or the odds that the user is savvy enough
to use the signon viewer? If the former, this was completed long ago (but of
course you can't use it yet until pollmann or brendan fix the blocking bug that
is currently making the tabs inoperable). If the latter, then ask German that
question.
Updated•25 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Comment 9•25 years ago
|
||
The former was my question. Since this will eventually be implemented once the
blocker bug is fixed, marking verified. Thanks.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•25 years ago
|
||
Just to clarify. It will not "eventually be implemented" -- it is implemented
now. As soon as the bug is fixed you will be able to see it.
Comment 11•25 years ago
|
||
ah, semantics
Comment 12•25 years ago
|
||
Bulk move to Single Signon component, which has subsumed Password Cache.
Component: Password Cache → Single Signon
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: Browser → Seamonkey
Comment hidden (offtopic) |
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•