Closed
Bug 923348
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Changing a sidebar.url from A to B then back to A does not work
Categories
(Add-on SDK Graveyard :: General, defect, P1)
Add-on SDK Graveyard
General
Tracking
(firefox25 unaffected, firefox26 fixed, firefox27 fixed, firefox28 fixed, b2g-v1.2 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla28
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox25 | --- | unaffected |
firefox26 | --- | fixed |
firefox27 | --- | fixed |
firefox28 | --- | fixed |
b2g-v1.2 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: evold, Assigned: evold)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [qa-])
Attachments
(2 files)
(deleted),
text/html
|
zer0
:
review+
|
Details |
(deleted),
patch
|
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
lsblakk
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
If you change a sidebar's url from it's first value to another value, then back to the original value, that fails at the moment with this error:
"Creating two sidebars with the same title + url is not allowed"
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → evold
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Pointer to Github pull-request
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #813416 -
Flags: review?(zer0)
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 813416 [details]
Pointer to Github pull request: https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1258
r+ with the comments in PR addressed.
Attachment #813416 -
Flags: review?(zer0) → review+
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/1f225644b37610f6d516cddaaf4989708f661e22
Bug 923348 - Changing a sidebar.url from A to B then back to A does not work
https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/commit/ae52323a0c46c3b42aa67ea0cc95234dac29e4e4
Merge pull request #1258 from erikvold/923348
Bug 923348 - Changing a sidebar.url from A to B then back to A does not work r=@zer0
Assignee | ||
Updated•11 years ago
|
Blocks: sdk/ui/sidebar
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 813416 [details]
Pointer to Github pull request: https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1258
[Approval Request Comment]
User impact if declined: A new Jetpack api will throw errors in what may be a typical use case.
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): yes
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Low/No risk
Attachment #813416 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
How does this work? Is there something to land to mozilla-central? It's not clear what I'm approving Aurora uplift for when the pull requests are all in github.
Flags: needinfo?(evold)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
Dave can you answer Lukas ?
Flags: needinfo?(evold) → needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment 7•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to lsblakk@mozilla.com [:lsblakk] from comment #5)
> How does this work? Is there something to land to mozilla-central? It's
> not clear what I'm approving Aurora uplift for when the pull requests are
> all in github.
We'll manually take the patch from https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1258/files and apply it to the addon-sdk directory of the aurora branch. Sorry that that's not clear. We can just upload the patch as an attachment in the future if that is more helpful?
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dave Townsend (:Mossop) from comment #7)
> We'll manually take the patch from
> https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1258/files and apply it to the
> addon-sdk directory of the aurora branch. Sorry that that's not clear. We
> can just upload the patch as an attachment in the future if that is more
> helpful?
Sorry if I'm missing something here - but will that manual patch also get applied to mozilla-central? Is there a new way of doing addon-sdk integration where we don't ensure that later versions are matched up with code landings?
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 813416 [details]
Pointer to Github pull request: https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/pull/1258
Sorry, it seems that our normally weekly process for uplifting all our code to m-c hasn't happened in a couple of weeks. I'll find out why, get this all uplifted then we can talk about approvals.
Attachment #813416 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
This landed in m-c three days ago so we would now like to get approval for aurora and beta.
[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): New feature - sidebars API
User impact if declined: Feature will be broken in some cases
Testing completed (on m-c, etc.): 3 days testing, very few add-ons using this yet though
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Very low risk, alternative would be removing sidebar feature entirely
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Flags: needinfo?(dtownsend+bugmail)
Comment 11•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 829483 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
If you don't mind throwing in the changeset link for m-c when you put in the ones for aurora/beta that would be great for posterity.
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #829483 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 12•11 years ago
|
||
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f4fdb40f96b1
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/74cf83afd3ca
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/851face56dbe
status-firefox25:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox26:
--- → fixed
status-firefox27:
--- → fixed
status-firefox28:
--- → fixed
Updated•11 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•11 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla28
Comment 13•11 years ago
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
status-b2g-v1.2:
--- → fixed
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•