Closed
Bug 1000359
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Assertion failure: "Should only make struts for children with 'visibility:collapse'" with flexbox
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1639053
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase)
Attachments
(3 files)
Assertion failure: 2 == mFrame->StyleVisibility()->mVisible (Should only make struts for children with 'visibility:collapse'), at layout/generic/nsFlexContainerFrame.cpp:1220
|
Reporter | |
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
|
||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
I can reproduce this in my Linux debug build.
Marking as depending on bug 783470, which added the "visibility:collapse" behavior for flexbox.
Depends on: 783470
|
|
||
Updated•11 years ago
|
OS: Mac OS X → All
|
|
||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Yeah, this is a regression from bug 983427.
We build the strut-list by walking over our flex lines & their flex items, which may be in reverse order with respect to the frame list. (after bug 983427) So the strut indexes may be indexes with respect to the *end* of our child list (walking in reverse). But when we use them, in GenerateFlexLines, we treat them as if they're indexes from the start.
Blocks: 983427
|
|
Reporter | |
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
|
||
Comment 5•5 years ago
|
||
Bug 1639053 removed the ability to reverse flex container's axes internally, so the testcases can no longer trigger assertions.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•