Closed Bug 1024170 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

JSCompartment wrap fails to wrap string on worker

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla33
Tracking Status
firefox30 --- wontfix
firefox31 + fixed
firefox32 + fixed
firefox33 --- fixed
b2g-v2.0 --- fixed
b2g-v2.1 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: seward.zheng, Assigned: seward.zheng)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [qa-])

Attachments

(1 file)

js/src/jscompartment.cpp:276 JSCompartment calls str->zone(), which requires the zone to have exclusive access. This is in fact unnecessary.
Attached patch Patch (deleted) — Splinter Review
Assignee: nobody → szheng
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: review?(bhackett1024)
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: review?(bhackett1024) → review+
Shihua, this will need a full try run also.
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
(In reply to ben turner [:bent] (use the needinfo? flag!) from comment #2) > Shihua, this will need a full try run also. Try: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=5165684548a3
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Blocks: 901097
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla33
Blocks: 964059
This needs backporting to branches, no? Please request approvals.
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Comment on attachment 8438796 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Approval Request Comment [Feature/regressing bug #]: 600402 [User impact if declined]: Have unexpected failures when dealing with strings on web workers [Describe test coverage new/current, TBPL]: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=5165684548a3 , passed [Risks and why]: Low [String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Looking at bug 600402, I can see that the bug existed for the last 3 years. We are late in the beta cycle, why do you think we should take it?
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Note that this blocks bug 1027221 from being uplifted as well.
Blocks: 1027221
(In reply to Sylvestre Ledru [:sylvestre] from comment #8) > Looking at bug 600402, I can see that the bug existed for the last 3 years. > We are late in the beta cycle, why do you think we should take it? This bug, as well as bug 1027221, blocks worker features from shipping. It will be very helpful to get them landed in beta channel early. In addition, the stability is not expected to be impaired by these patches.
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8438796 - Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Is this something that impacts b2g v1.4 (b2g30) as well? If so, should this be blocking?
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
Tagging [qa-]. Please advise if this needs QA attention before we release.
Whiteboard: [qa-]
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-4] from comment #12) > Is this something that impacts b2g v1.4 (b2g30) as well? If so, should this > be blocking? Impact, but nonblocking.
Flags: needinfo?(szheng)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: