Closed
Bug 1032364
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Change gralloc buffer's key to 64bit
Categories
(Core :: Graphics: Layers, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: sotaro, Assigned: sotaro)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 1 obsolete file)
(deleted),
patch
|
sotaro
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
(deleted),
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1031527 +++
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
This bug is created based on bug 1031527 Comment 7. As a gralloc buffer's key, "int" is used. 32 bit is too small for it. We should change it to 64bit.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sotaro.ikeda.g
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Nominate to "b2g-v2.0+". This bug blocks b2g-v2.0+ bug.
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0?
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Sotaro Ikeda [:sotaro] from comment #3) > Created attachment 8448213 [details] [diff] [review] > patch - Change gralloc buffer's key to 64bit It removes atomic from SharedBufferManagerParent::sBufferKey. gecko does not support 64bit atomic now. sBufferKey is used only in SharedBufferManagerParent::RecvAllocateGrallocBuffer(). Therefore Atomic is not necessary for the sBufferKey.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8448213 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar)
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → 2.0+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8448213 -
Flags: review?(jmuizelaar) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Un-bitrot. Carry "r=jmuizelaar".
Attachment #8448213 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8449487 -
Flags: review+
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Sotaro may have already asked to test with this patch, but doing it in the bug just so that others can tell.
Flags: needinfo?(mvines)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mvines) → needinfo?(ikumar)
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/312fd139c63e
(In reply to Milan Sreckovic [:milan] from comment #7) > Sotaro may have already asked to test with this patch, but doing it in the > bug just so that others can tell. It doesn't apply cleanly on 2.0. Can you please provide an updated patch.
Flags: needinfo?(ikumar)
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/312fd139c63e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla33
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Inder from comment #9) > (In reply to Milan Sreckovic [:milan] from comment #7) > > Sotaro may have already asked to test with this patch, but doing it in the > > bug just so that others can tell. > It doesn't apply cleanly on 2.0. Can you please provide an updated patch. Created a patch attachment 8450186 [details] [diff] [review] for b2g v2.0.
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/9886da8086bc
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → fixed
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → fixed
status-firefox31:
--- → wontfix
status-firefox32:
--- → fixed
status-firefox33:
--- → fixed
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
No steps available to perform verification. Unable to verify bug.
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?][QAnalyst-verify-]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Correction: Cannot perform verification due to automation steps in original bug of this cloned bug.
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?][QAnalyst-verify-] → [QAnalyst-Triage+][QAnalyst-verify-]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•