06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : RIL Worker: Parcel handling threw TypeError: RIL.operator is null 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : ICCUtilsHelperObject.prototype.updateDisplayCondition@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:13862:1 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : callback@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:13069:1 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : ICCIOHelperObject.prototype.processICCIOReadBinary@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:12063:7 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : ICC_COMMAND_READ_BINARY@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:12100:3 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : ICCIOHelperObject.prototype.processICCIO@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:11936:5 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : REQUEST_SIM_IO@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:5612:3 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : RilObject.prototype.handleParcel@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:5249:7 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : BufObject.prototype.processParcel@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:162:5 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : require._tmpModules[":resource://gre/modules/workers/worker_buf.js"]/Buf.processIncoming@blob:4d42b0cf-9367-499f-a348-a1efd8ed3d89:536:9 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : ContextPool.handleRilMessage@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:14793:5 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko : onRILMessage@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:14840:3 06-24 16:40:13.577 167 452 I Gecko :

Looks duplicate of bug 944635. Please re-open if not, thanks.

(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #1) > Looks duplicate of bug 944635. Please re-open if not, thanks. > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 944635 *** Hi HsinYi: This bug is duplicated to Bug 944635 for sure, however, we only submit patch to m-c via 944635, but Dolphin also needs this patch for 1.4 too. Please advise should we use 944635 for tracking 1.4 issue? Thanks!! Shawn

(In reply to shawn ku [:sku] from comment #2) > (In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #1) > > Looks duplicate of bug 944635. Please re-open if not, thanks. > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 944635 *** > > Hi HsinYi: > This bug is duplicated to Bug 944635 for sure, however, we only submit > patch to m-c via 944635, but Dolphin also needs this patch for 1.4 too. > > Please advise should we use 944635 for tracking 1.4 issue? > Thanks!! > Shawn I think so. I already nominate 1.4? for bug 944635. Once passing PM triage, we could uplift a 1.4 patch there. We don't need to have a separate bug for tracking exactly the same issue :)

(In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #3) > (In reply to shawn ku [:sku] from comment #2) > > (In reply to Hsin-Yi Tsai [:hsinyi] from comment #1) > > > Looks duplicate of bug 944635. Please re-open if not, thanks. > > > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 944635 *** > > > > Hi HsinYi: > > This bug is duplicated to Bug 944635 for sure, however, we only submit > > patch to m-c via 944635, but Dolphin also needs this patch for 1.4 too. > > > > Please advise should we use 944635 for tracking 1.4 issue? > > Thanks!! > > Shawn > > I think so. I already nominate 1.4? for bug 944635. Once passing PM triage, > we could uplift a 1.4 patch there. We don't need to have a separate bug for > tracking exactly the same issue :) Thanks for your prompt reply:)