Closed
Bug 1039529
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Add an API to know which kind of video streams a web page is using
Categories
(Core :: WebRTC, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla33
People
(Reporter: florian, Assigned: jesup)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
(deleted),
patch
|
jesup
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
The current API http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/dom/media/nsIMediaManager.idl#22 : void mediaCaptureWindowState(in nsIDOMWindow aWindow, out boolean aVideo, out boolean aAudio); is no longer enough now that we are adding support for screen/window sharing (bug 983504).
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: Add an API to know which kind video streams a web page is using → Add an API to know which kind of video streams a web page is using
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8456936 -
Flags: review?(pkerr)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8456936 [details] [diff] [review] Add screen and window sharing booleans to MediaCaptureWindowState Review of attachment 8456936 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: content/media/webrtc/MediaEngineWebRTC.h @@ +329,5 @@ > > + virtual const dom::MediaSourceEnum GetMediaSource() { > + return dom::MediaSourceEnum::Microphone; > + } > + I am assuming, since I do not see a matching method on MediaEngineWebRTCVideoSource, that the audio source is always a dom::MediaSourceEnum::Microphone but that the GetMediaSource() for video is sorted out in the subclass.
Attachment #8456936 -
Flags: review?(pkerr) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8457736 [details] [diff] [review] interdiffs for changes to avoid over-reuse of dom::MediaSourceEnum The MediaSourceEnum dom type is for Video constraints, so adding microphone to it wouldn't be reasonable or match the proposal; use our own internal enum that's a superset of that.
Attachment #8457736 -
Flags: review?(gpascutto)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8457736 [details] [diff] [review] interdiffs for changes to avoid over-reuse of dom::MediaSourceEnum Review of attachment 8457736 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This reeks of "we're going to have to replace it all eventually". ::: content/media/webrtc/MediaEngine.h @@ +44,5 @@ > +enum MediaSourceType { > + Camera = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Camera, > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, Too subtle. Need at least a big XXX and a bug nr to remove the commented part, which I assume is the goal. @@ +45,5 @@ > + Camera = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Camera, > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, > + //Browser = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Browser, Same remark. @@ +46,5 @@ > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, > + //Browser = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Browser, > + Microphone So dom::MediaSourceEnum is really dom::VideoSourceEnum?
Attachment #8457736 -
Flags: review?(gpascutto) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gian-Carlo Pascutto [:gcp] from comment #5) > This reeks of "we're going to have to replace it all eventually". We'll see where the WG goes; I think having an internal type separate from theirs is good in any case. > > ::: content/media/webrtc/MediaEngine.h > @@ +44,5 @@ > > +enum MediaSourceType { > > + Camera = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Camera, > > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, > > Too subtle. Need at least a big XXX and a bug nr to remove the commented > part, which I assume is the goal. Bug 1038926 (window-sharing bug) > > @@ +45,5 @@ > > + Camera = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Camera, > > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, > > + //Browser = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Browser, > > Same remark. > > @@ +46,5 @@ > > + Screen = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Screen, > > + Application = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Application, > > + Window, // = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Window, > > + //Browser = (int) dom::MediaSourceEnum::Browser, Browser is in the proposal today, but we don't support it and it's unclear if it's going to stay in the proposal or handle that a different way. (I suspect Browser will go away) > > + Microphone > > So dom::MediaSourceEnum is really dom::VideoSourceEnum? In the Proposal: yes.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
merged patch for checkin
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8456936 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8458013 [details] [diff] [review] Add screen and window sharing booleans to MediaCaptureWindowState carry forward r+=pkerr,gcp
Attachment #8458013 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8457736 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/d00f111241a8 In 34, we'll replace this with a list of what's being shared
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla33
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d00f111241a8
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Randell Jesup [:jesup] PTO until Jan 5 from comment #6) > (In reply to Gian-Carlo Pascutto [:gcp] from comment #5) > > > This reeks of "we're going to have to replace it all eventually". > > We'll see where the WG goes; I think having an internal type separate from > theirs is good in any case. I ran across MediaSourceType in the code and traced it back to this bug which I missed when it went by, sorry. Unless I hear objections, I'd like to merge this back to using the pure dom enums in Bug 1006707. That patch will make MediaSource a regular DOMString instead of a webidl enum - to match the spec - so adding "Microphone" will no longer have any behavioral impact.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•