Closed
Bug 1059243
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Test failure 'getEntity: Entity - privatebrowsingpage.perwindow.* has been found' in /testPrivateBrowsing/*
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect, P1)
Mozilla QA Graveyard
Mozmill Tests
Tracking
(firefox34 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox34 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: andrei, Assigned: andrei)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, Whiteboard: [mozmill-test-failure])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
AndreeaMatei
:
review+
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We have 2 failures. Looks like some entities have changed.
Test: /testPrivateBrowsing/testAboutPrivateBrowsing.js
Failure: getEntity: Entity - privatebrowsingpage.perwindow.issueDesc.normal has been found - got 'null'
Test: /testPrivateBrowsing/testOpenClosePBKeyboardShortcut.js
Failure: getEntity: Entity - privatebrowsingpage.perwindow.description has been found - got 'null'
mc pushlog:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=dc352a7bf234&tochange=0753f7b93ab7
Bug 1009370 is the regressor.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Specifically those changes caused the regression on our side:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/diff/8f5ad2b5a775/browser/locales/en-US/chrome/browser/aboutPrivateBrowsing.dtd
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Quick fix, I updated the DTD entities and the node selectors.
I do not like all selectors I had to use, but some elements are lacking proper identification. To improve this we will need to update the about:privatebrowsing page with more relevant hooks (if we deem it important).
With the current selectors the tests might break again if the page content gets reordered.
Attachment #8479856 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8479856 [details] [diff] [review]
1.patch
Review of attachment 8479856 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good. Maybe we could get a feedback if they plan to update the pages further?
Attachment #8479856 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Attachment #8479856 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Attachment #8479856 -
Flags: review+
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8479856 [details] [diff] [review]
1.patch
Review of attachment 8479856 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I agree regarding accessibility. Feel free to file new bugs. To get our tests fixed it looks fine to me.
Attachment #8479856 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Landed:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/5c2689122d12 (default)
Thanks Andrei!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•