Closed Bug 1104627 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

[FFOS2.0][Woodduck]Stop PDP request after Clear Codes 33 & 29.

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect, P2)

defect

Tracking

(b2g-v2.0 affected, b2g-v2.0M affected, b2g-v2.1 affected, b2g-v2.2 affected)

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1094572
Tracking Status
b2g-v2.0 --- affected
b2g-v2.0M --- affected
b2g-v2.1 --- affected
b2g-v2.2 --- affected

People

(Reporter: sync-1, Unassigned, NeedInfo)

References

Details

Attachments

(5 files)

(deleted), image/png
Details
(deleted), application/octet-stream
Details
(deleted), image/png
Details
(deleted), application/vnd.ms-excel
Details
(deleted), application/octet-stream
Details
DEFECT DESCRIPTION: The handset must stop the PDP request after receive the clear codes 30 or 29 for third time. REPRODUCING PROCEDURES: 1.-Insert a SIM card without data access. 2.-You will see that the handset try to obtain the PDP no matter what. EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR: The handset should stop trying to get the PDP context if it receives the clear codes for third time. I'm attaching two images with detailed procedure. ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION: TEST PLAN REFERENCE: TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED: USER IMPACT: Blocking REPRODUCING RATE: 5/5 For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior: Report phone number:0752-2639862(61862)
Attached image Clear Code 33 (deleted) —
Attached file Logs (deleted) —
Attached image Clear Code 29 (deleted) —
Attached file Telcel Logs (deleted) —
Attached file mtklog on FFOS (deleted) —
Hi Shawn, Could you please help to check the problem? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(sku)
Blocks: Woodduck
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0M?
Hi there: Is there any spec. to define clear code 33 and 29 for reference? Thanks!! Shawn
Flags: needinfo?(sync-1)
Please also check Bug 1094572, Moz implement an error cause handling for such case. Not only 29|31 are handled, but introduced more error cause there. However, it is on m-c now (not in 2.0m), please also let us know if it is okay for partner to accept the solution?
I've prepared a patch for v2.0m in bug 1094572, in case you need it. You may also want to apply the patch in bug 1105117.
(In reply to Jessica Jong [:jjong] [:jessica] from comment #9) > I've prepared a patch for v2.0m in bug 1094572, in case you need it. You may > also want to apply the patch in bug 1105117. Thank you so much, Jessica.
Dear Mozilla, Is there any patch need I do a test?
(In reply to sync-1 from comment #11) > Dear Mozilla, Is there any patch need I do a test? Hi Reporter, Is this a certification blocker? If not, we suggest to reject the case for 2.0M. 2.2 will have this fix for sure. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(sku)
(In reply to comment #7) > Comment from Mozilla:(In reply to sync-1 from comment #11) > > Dear Mozilla, Is there any patch need I do a test? > Hi Reporter, > Is this a certification blocker? If not, we suggest to reject the case for > 2.0M. 2.2 will have this fix for sure. Thanks! This is an requirement of LATAM Telcel operators, need you to fix it. Thanks!
Discussed with DengWei. Postpone to 2.2.
Blocks: Woodduck_P2
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Dear Dengwei, 这个问题Mozilla会在2.2版本解决,原PR已经postponed,请关闭此PR,谢谢!
Resolution: WONTFIX → DUPLICATE
blocking-b2g: 2.0M? → ---
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: