Closed
Bug 110692
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
Properly encode subjects in newchanged mails.
Categories
(Bugzilla :: Email Notifications, defect, P1)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
Bugzilla 2.22
People
(Reporter: marcus, Assigned: glob)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: i18n [blocker will fix])
Attachments
(1 file)
(deleted),
patch
|
preed
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I'm using both Bugzilla and Courier on an in-house-system. After entering a Bug, I get the following message: Bug 2 posted 550-The headers in this message contain 8-bit text, which violates RFC 2047. 550-Sorry, I cannot accept any mail without the required MIME headers. 550 See for more information.
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
What mail program are you using, and what version? Any special configuration options?
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
I'm using courier 0.35 Btw, the mail message are configurable by the administrator of Bugzilla? And he can put any text he wants into them, no matter if the characters used are within the 7-bit-ASCII range. If I read RFC 2045 (Message Header Extensions for Non-ASCII Text) correctly, any characters which appear in the message header and are not part of US-ASCII, have to be encoded by the MUA (which in this case would be Bugzilla). Currently, we just read the mail-messages from localconfig, replace some keywords, and pass the result to the MTA as is.
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
I don't see anything obviously in high-ASCII in the default, so I'm thinking it's the "to" or "subject" headers (probably subject) which take data from Bugzilla. How would we appropriately encode these? What summaries are you entering in? Are you entering high-ASCII characters into them? Does it go away if you don't?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
Oh, you simple have to use german umlauts like הצ� in your summary, to get high-ASCII characters. So this is an internationalization problem. For the appropriate encoding, please have look at RFC 2045. For example, the encoding for 'A' in quoted-printable would be =41
Updated•23 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P2
Summary: Default %newchangedmail% doesn't comply with RFC 2047 → Properly encode subjects in newchanged mails.
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 2.18
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Hi KaiRo, As you requested at FOSDEM, I added you to this bug. Marcus
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Have also a look at bug 126266. For emails this creates this header: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=%encoding% Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit while this isn't necessarily as good as MIME encoding, this produces at least correct output. (As a bonus you also get the charset for HTML.)
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Changing default owner of Email Notifications component to JayPee, a.k.a. J. Paul Reed (preed@sigkill.com). Jake will be offline for a few months.
Assignee: jake → preed
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
This becomes a problem for us when bug summaries have Japanese text in them. Actually anything out of 7-bit ASCII range, since all of our data is stored in UTF-8. Has anyone looked at fixing this yet? If not I'm going to in the next couple of days. The lack of a patch indicates 'no, nothing has been done.', but I wanted to ask.
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
You might want to hold off on this until all emails get templatised as the new development cycle ramps up. This might automatically solve the problem. The easy and reliable solution would be to escape the entire email (for all emails) after it's constructed, but I'm not sure if there are any problems precluding that approach.
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
There are two sides to this: the message body itself can be encoded in base64 or quoted-printable. The subject line uses the MIME encoding: a bit different.
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
Headers and bodies will probably be separate templates, assuming the headers are going to be templates at all, so that's probably not an issue.
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
I've been running into this with bugzilla.mozilla.org and Postfix's strict_7bit_headers option. With it enabled, I no longer get bugzilla emails. Instead, I see this: reject: mime-error improper use of 8-bit data in message header: Received: (from nobody@localhost)??by mothra.mozilla.org with ? id h09C0ca09098;??Thu, 9 Jan 2003 04 from mothra.mozilla.org[207.200.81.216]; from=<nobody@mozilla.org> to=<bugzilla@slamb.org> From looking at old ones, it's easy to see why. Every email includes a Received: header like this: Received: (from nobody@localhost) by mothra.mozilla.org with œ id h072KKM28806; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 18:20:20 -0800 (PST) What's the "œ" doing there?
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
I've been strugglig for some time now to get norwegian characters to display correctly in the mail Subject of mails from bugzilla (using 2.16.2 here). Here is my working solution (to processmail): Add: use Encode qw/encode decode/; Change line reading: $substs{"summary"} = $values{'short_desc'}; to $substs{"summary"} = encode('MIME-Header', $values{'short_desc'}); As this is my first go at this - please forgive a possible 'plain stupidness'. Anyways - it works for me ;)
Comment 18•22 years ago
|
||
unfortunatelly i was not able to make work encode for perl 5.6.1 (using encode::compat) could somebody help me, please?
Comment 19•22 years ago
|
||
Yeah, I just noticed this self-same issue with Bugzilla 2,14 (must pester the server manager to upgrade soon). It would seem the problem is that the Subject: lines of emails aren't being checked for high-value (>127) characters and no MIME-escaping is occurring as a result. This'd be an i18n bug, for sure. RFC 2047 details the howto at length but, basically, you want the Subject: line to look something like =?iso-8859-1? q?this=20is=20some=20text?= (where the "=20"s are spaces, natch, though space can also be translated to an underscore).
Comment 20•21 years ago
|
||
Here is a patch that allows international characters in subjects which seems at least to fix partially the problems reported in this bug.. I've created a new variable %isosummary% because the %summary% variable is used elsewhere.. so existing installs needs to change %summary% to %isosummary% in their existing newchangedemail configuration. It uses MIME::Words
Comment 21•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132868 [details] [diff] [review] Patch against 2.17 Head for iso subjects Asking for review
Attachment #132868 -
Flags: review?
Comment 23•21 years ago
|
||
My issues with this patch: -- It requires another module; that may be inevitable, but... -- This probably isn't going to make it into 2.17.5... mainly because there's really no reason for it to go in, and we're trying to make 2.17.5 stable; given that: -- This patch is against the old defparams.pl way of doing things; TT may actually take care of this for us (it may not; I haven't checked), but with bug 84876 (see today's comment of a few minutes ago) and bug 100089 we're using TT
Comment 24•21 years ago
|
||
JP, can you check out whether TT takes care of this for us, and if so, can you set a dependency to your bugs (that is, if you're actually *going* to finish then :-)
Comment 25•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132868 [details] [diff] [review] Patch against 2.17 Head for iso subjects Per Jaypee's comments, pushing the review request to his queue.
Attachment #132868 -
Flags: review? → review?(preed)
Comment 26•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132868 [details] [diff] [review] Patch against 2.17 Head for iso subjects If we're going to do this, you might as well do it the right way and make it part of the email template stuff in bug 84876. Yes, it's not in yet, but the subject stuff that's there isn't going to change, and it should be going in shortly now (where shortly is actually something measurable). I also don't like the idea of requiring MIME::Tools, but...
Attachment #132868 -
Flags: review?(preed) → review-
Comment 27•21 years ago
|
||
Wow, I completely missed this bug happening... JayPee: we have no choice but to require MIME::Tools if we want standards-compliant emails and still do i18n (unless you feel like reinventing the wheel). If you read existing comments in bug 126266, you'll see this has been the plan for quite some time. That new module requirement is inevitable.
Depends on: 84876, bz-charset
Comment 28•21 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 132868 [details] [diff] [review] Patch against 2.17 Head for iso subjects The proper way to do this, I think, is to modify the existing %summary% replacement instead of making a new replacement. That way existing sites get it without having to modify their mail parameter. (defparams.pl is only the defaults)
Comment 29•21 years ago
|
||
I would agree, except that the %summary% replacement is if I recall correctly used in cases where the 'iso' encoding should not happen (inside the email for exemple)..
Comment 30•21 years ago
|
||
As I understand it, you need to encode the header lines all in the same way, and that way is the same for all headers. As such to me the obvious implementation is to provide a filter over the template output and leave everything unencoded in the template. Or alternatively get a module that automatically encodes headers. Expecting this to be done in templates is just wrong, given it is compulsory, makes the templates more complicated and people are just going to forget it or accidentally remove it. As long as we don't do something silly like put both the headers and body in the same template this shouldn't be a problem.
Comment 31•21 years ago
|
||
Yeah, Matty's right. The new email system that JayPee is doing should be able to handle it that way pretty easily, since the headers are going to be done separate in the "new world"
Updated•21 years ago
|
Severity: normal → critical
OS: Windows 98 → All
Priority: P2 → P1
Hardware: PC → All
Whiteboard: i18n
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.18 → Bugzilla 2.20
Updated•20 years ago
|
Comment 32•20 years ago
|
||
OK, my developers at Kerio (in the Czech Republic) want this, so I'm taking it.
Assignee: preed → mkanat
Severity: critical → major
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•20 years ago
|
||
my latest patch on bug Bug 126266 resolves this issue. we can probably make this bug as a dupe.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Assignee: mkanat → bugzilla
Whiteboard: i18n → i18n [blocker will fix]
Comment 34•20 years ago
|
||
Now that the blocker is going to 2.22, I'd imagine this is going to 2.22 also.
Target Milestone: Bugzilla 2.20 → Bugzilla 2.22
Comment 35•19 years ago
|
||
Fixed by blocking bug 126266.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•12 years ago
|
QA Contact: matty_is_a_geek → default-qa
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•