Closed
Bug 1114884
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
There should be different approach for handling different storage threshold
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(feature-b2g:2.5+, b2g-v2.0 affected, b2g-v2.0M affected, b2g-v2.1 affected, b2g-v2.2 affected)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
feature-b2g | 2.5+ |
People
(Reporter: jocheng, Unassigned, NeedInfo)
References
Details
FFOS should handle storage in following 3 different level:
1. Storage available
2. Low storage (Just warning, device still functioning)
3. No storage (If user do not clean data,device will not functioning)
Partner should be able to customize threshold value for item 2 and 3 in order to fulfill devices with different storage.
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: Woodduck
status-b2g-v2.0:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.0M:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → affected
status-b2g-v2.2:
--- → affected
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:
This is highly request by partner. We should implement this as early as possible.
blocking-b2g: --- → 3.0?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: low-storage
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Blocks: LowStorage
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
We should definitely fix this.
I guess we need some UX around level 2 and 3.
We should also make sure for that the basic functionality is still working for level 3 (starting the phone and making phone calls) but thats probably for another bug.
Flags: needinfo?(firefoxos-ux-bugzilla)
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
This feature is not included in the roadmap of v3 partner features (see Aha). This should be assigned to the UX lead after it's decided if this is happening, though we'll likely have to wait for more staff, as all the UX people who would take this are no longer with Mozilla.
Flags: needinfo?(firefoxos-ux-bugzilla)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Rob, adding you to this since I won't be here, in case it comes up again.
Flags: needinfo?(rmacdonald)
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Rob,
We need your help for UX design on low storage situation as this is in 2.5 scope.
Thanks!
blocking-b2g: 2.5? → 2.5+
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Josh Cheng [:josh] from comment #6)
> Hi Rob,
> We need your help for UX design on low storage situation as this is in 2.5
> scope.
> Thanks!
Looks like this should get feature+ instead of blocking+ from bug 1167167.
It is also clear to me which team will be responsible of this feature since this is listed as a 2.5 feature without a team/EM in the spreadsheet! ni'ing Gregor in case this falls into either of the teams as a late requirement.
Flags: needinfo?(anygregor)
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.5+ → ---
feature-b2g: --- → 2.5+
Flags: needinfo?(anygregor)
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
> It is also clear
It is also "unclear to me..."
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(tchen)
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(tchen)
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Firefox OS is not being worked on
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•