Closed Bug 114513 Opened 23 years ago Closed 22 years ago

N620 crash [@ 0x003b009c - nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock]

Categories

(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, defect)

PowerPC
Mac System 9.x
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INVALID

People

(Reporter: jcarpenter0524, Assigned: dbaron)

Details

(Keywords: crash)

Crash Data

This bug is a crasher for N621. It is not really a topcrash yet, but may turn into one as more data comes in. Count Offset Real Signature [ 4 0x003b009c 5b06d24e - nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames() ] Crash date range: 2001-12-07 to 2001-12-08 Min/Max Seconds since last crash: 168 - 3298 Min/Max Runtime: 168 - 3298 Keyword List : Count Platform List 4 MacOS version 9.2.2 Count Build Id List 4 2001113009 No of Unique Users 4 Stack trace(Frame) 0x003b009c nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames() [nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp line 9924] nsCSSFrameConstructor::AttributeChanged() [nsCSSFrameConstructor.cpp line 10298] StyleSetImpl::AttributeChanged() [nsStyleSet.cpp line 1227] PresShell::AttributeChanged() [nsPresShell.cpp line 5011] nsXULDocument::AttributeChanged() [nsXULDocument.cpp line 1740] nsXULElement::UnsetAttr() [nsXULElement.cpp line 3345] (219684) Comments: I was checking preferences I had several disclosure triangles open and was in privacy preferences and couldn't scroll to see next preference ( the next preference was nearly out of the visible box) ==================================================================================================== Count Offset Real Signature [ 3 0x003b009c 3839099e - nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock() ] Crash date range: 2001-12-09 to 2001-12-09 Min/Max Seconds since last crash: 330 - 2534 Min/Max Runtime: 330 - 2534 Keyword List : Count Platform List 3 MacOS version 9.2.2 Count Build Id List 3 2001113009 No of Unique Users 2 Stack trace(Frame) 0x003b009c nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock() [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp line 572] nsBlockReflowContext::ReflowBlock() [nsBlockReflowContext.cpp line 338] nsBlockFrame::ReflowBlockFrame() [nsBlockFrame.cpp line 2967] (258256) Comments: Getting the listings for zip-code 98661 (244490) URL: www.daum.net (244490) Comments: I'm connect to "www.daum.net" ==================================================================================================== Count Offset Real Signature [ 1 0x003b009c 67fa79fa - nsImapProtocol::Run() ] Crash date range: 2001-12-07 to 2001-12-07 Min/Max Seconds since last crash: 927 - 927 Min/Max Runtime: 927 - 927 Keyword List : Count Platform List 1 MacOS version 9.2.2 Count Build Id List 1 2001113009 No of Unique Users 1 Stack trace(Frame) 0x003b009c nsImapProtocol::Run() [nsImapProtocol.cpp line 752] nsThread::Main() [nsThread.cpp line 105] _PR_UserRunThread() [pruthr.c line 503] _PR_UserDestroyThread() [pruthr.c line 374] (193145) Comments: Exiting the program. Once again dumped into MacsBug as I was in 6.2. I do use IMAP e-mail so the bug I saw on Bugzilla is probably the culprit.
Keywords: crash
Why are 3 different signatures filed as one bug?
Yeah, they all look like different crashes that just happen to have the same stack signature. Tom: Let's wait until we get more data and log them as separate bugs.
Severity: normal → critical
|ProcessRestyledFrames| on the stack? Reminiscent of bug 123049 & co.
This bug is ancient and since each stack shown here represents different crashes, just gonna mark this invalid. If we see any of those crashes in recent Talkback data, we'll log separate bugs.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Summary: N620 crash [@ 0x003b009c - nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames - nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock - nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock] → N620 crash [@ 0x003b009c - nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock]
Crash Signature: [@ 0x003b009c - nsCSSFrameConstructor::ProcessRestyledFrames | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock | nsBlockReflowContext::DoReflowBlock]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.