Closed
Bug 1147799
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[Flame][App/Datastore Permissions]The cert error page can't appear again when you visit the same website for the second time.
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::System::Browser Chrome, defect)
Firefox OS Graveyard
Gaia::System::Browser Chrome
ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
Tracking
(b2g-v2.1 affected, b2g-v2.2 affected, b2g-master affected)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 858730
People
(Reporter: jihao, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [systemsfe])
Attachments
(2 files)
[1.Description]: [Flame][v2.2&3.0][App/Datastore Permissions]The cert error page can't appear again when you visit the same website for the second time. Attachments: logcat_flame_0611.txt and no_cert_error_page.3gp Occurrence time: 06:11 [2.Testing Steps]: 1. Open the browser app. 2. Tap on the URL and type: https://cav.receita.fazenda.gov.br/eCAC/Aplicacao.aspx 3. Add a temporary exception. (Tap visit it) 4. Close the browser through the card viewer. 5. Open the browser app. 6. Tap on the URL and type: https://cav.receita.fazenda.gov.br/eCAC/Aplicacao.aspx [3.Expected Result]: 6.A cert error page should appear. [4.Actual Result]: 6.The cert error page will not appear. [5.Reproduction build]: Device:Flame 2.2 [Affected] Build ID 20150325162500 Gaia Revision 2d42a7c1d99472780e3aeb2e16d7cb0a4adbd222 Gaia Date 2015-03-25 20:46:52 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/ebb742bfe1a4 Gecko Version 37.0 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150325.200218 Firmware Date Wed Mar 25 20:02:30 EDT 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 Device:Flame 3.0 [Affected] Build ID 20150325160204 Gaia Revision 508b8d48fb5ecf08bf0e5b4fef42bc48b770e7f2 Gaia Date 2015-03-25 16:54:53 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/f40ee067d081 Gecko Version 39.0a1 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150325.191758 Firmware Date Wed Mar 25 19:18:07 EDT 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 [6.Reproduction Frequency]: Always Recurrence,5/5 [7.TCID]: 6914
status-b2g-v2.2:
--- → affected
status-b2g-master:
--- → affected
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.2?
Whiteboard: [systemsfe]
Updated•9 years ago
|
Component: Gaia::Browser → Gaia::System::Browser Chrome
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
This issue reproduces on Flame 2.1. Tap on "Visit site" button, close browser and re-visit the site doesn't prompt user for certification error. Even if I go to Settings and clear browser history and cookies it still doesn't prompt me again. Device: Flame 2.1 BuildID: 20150326001202 Gaia: 6f39e4e876152de1dcdcc0e7656197f22f105e4b Gecko: e00ae73d67a2 Gonk: b83fc73de7b64594cd74b33e498bf08332b5d87b Version: 34.0 (2.1) Firmware Version: v18D-1 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:34.0) Gecko/34.0 Firefox/34.0
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?]
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → affected
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Keywords: qawanted
Updated•9 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Its not a regression. Paul, what do you think, how serious is this?
Flags: needinfo?(ptheriault)
(In reply to Gregor Wagner [:gwagner] from comment #4) > Its not a regression. Paul, what do you think, how serious is this? Are you sure this is a regression? When you add an exception, you are adding the exception for this browsing session. Closing the "browser" app closes the tab that the browser is running, but it doesn't "close the browser" in the sense of stop b2g. So when you "reopen" the browser app, the exception is still there. (until b2g is restarted, for example if you restart your phone). This has been raised before (by myself, and also others - I'll find the dupes). I completely agree with original post - closing the browser app should clear the exceptions. But afaik this isn't a regression - I don't think we ever supported this.
Flags: needinfo?(ptheriault)
(In reply to Gregor Wagner [:gwagner] from comment #4) > Its not a regression. Paul, what do you think, how serious is this? I should learn to read? :) And yes its a dupe of 858730 To answer your actual question, I don't think this should block, but this *is* important (though I've never managed to convince anyone enough that this gets prioritized on our roadmap). My team is planning to take this in Q2 though if no-one gets to it sooner.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.2? → ---
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•