Closed Bug 1176349 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

/lockscreen/test_lockscreen_unlock_to_camera_with_passcode.py requires proper check for unlock

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::UI Tests, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: njpark, Assigned: njpark)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Currently, remains of the Bug 1123325 is causing /lockscreen/test_lockscreen_unlock_to_camera_with_passcode.py to fail unlocking lockscreen. Yet the script is reported to be passing. It needs lock_screen.wait_for_lockscreen_not_visible() as well as self.wait_for_condition(lambda m: self.apps.displayed_app.name == homescreen.name) at the end.
Depends on: 1123325
Ideally, this should be merged when 1123325 is fixed.
Assignee: nobody → npark
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn)
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(jlorenzo)
Comment on attachment 8624873 [details] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/30678 If this works, then that's great. I'm just wondering, wouldn't it be better to put these Waits in the app object's functions? http://mxr.mozilla.org/gaia/source/tests/python/gaia-ui-tests/gaiatest/apps/lockscreen/app.py
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn) → review+
Comment on attachment 8624873 [details] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/30678 Agreed with Martijn, we might use lockscreen.wait_for_lockscreen_not_visible() which would likely do the wait. As it's a method within LockScreen, we can add these waits in all the unlock methods. What do you think No-Jun?
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(jlorenzo)
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn)
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(jlorenzo)
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review+
Comment on attachment 8624873 [details] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/30678 One small nit. Apart from that, LGTM!
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(jlorenzo) → review+
I get merge conflicts when trying to import this pull request, could you perhaps merge it to the latest master?
Flags: needinfo?(npark)
Oh wait, this depends on the bug 1123325 fix? Shouldn't this be part as the updated pull request for bug 1123325 then, since that original pull request also tried to fix these tests.
(In reply to Martijn Wargers [:mwargers] (QA) from comment #7) > Oh wait, this depends on the bug 1123325 fix? Shouldn't this be part as the > updated pull request for bug 1123325 then, since that original pull request > also tried to fix these tests. Yes per comment 2, ideally this should be merged to master after Bug 1123325 is fixed. So I'm planning to merge it once Bug 1123325 is resolved. they are technically different bugs, since the problem fixed by this pull request have existed before bug 1123325.
Flags: needinfo?(npark)
Comment on attachment 8624873 [details] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/30678 Ok, fine by me then. The changes look fine by me. I would like to have run the tests myself, but I guess I would have to apply the pull request from 1123325, but that doesn't apply for me locally well, at all, so I guess I'm just giving an r+ like this.
Attachment #8624873 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: