Closed Bug 1193704 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Bugzilla Lite shows "No bugs :(" when you search information about the "RESOLVED-FIXED" bug using it's ID

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Bugzilla Lite, defect)

Product:
Firefox OS Graveyard
Component:
Gaia::Bugzilla Lite
Platform:
ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: cynthiatang, Assigned: daleharvey)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/bzlite/pull/45
(deleted), text/x-github-pull-request
robert.sajdok
: review+
robert.sajdok
: review+
Details
Build Number: eng.worker.20150619.224059 Steps to Reproduce: 1. Navigate to the Bugzilla Lit website 2. Sign in with the test account credentials 3. Tap 'Search' 4. Typing 1188749 (The Bug status is RESOLVED-FIXED.) Actual Results: Bugzilla Lite shows "No bugs :(" Expected Results: You can get the bug information that you searched
Assignee: nobody → robert.sajdok
Attached file Proposed fix (obsolete) (deleted) —
Attachment #8647711 - Flags: review?(dale)
Comment on attachment 8647711 [details] Proposed fix So it was on purpose that we search for open bugs by default because generally those are the ones people are interested in. However in the case of the user entering a bug number, then I think we should test for this case and give the bug back regardless of its status. Ultimately we need a way to filter bugs properly, but in the meantime I think that would be best. How does that sound?
Attachment #8647711 - Flags: review?(dale)
I think, this is a question to Cynthia. I do not have a good idea from the user's experience side.
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Jacqueline is the UX owner for Bugzilla Lite. I think we need her opinion.
Flags: needinfo?(ctang) → needinfo?(jsavory)
I agree with Dale here, if the user types in a specific number we should display the bug to the user even if its resolved. We do still need to create a proper search and filter flow, but for now I think this is a good solution.
Flags: needinfo?(jsavory)
Flags: needinfo?(dale)
Clearing, I seen the reply, cheers
Flags: needinfo?(dale)
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Gonna steal this Robert since its been a while
Assignee: robert.sajdok → dale
Attachment #8647711 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8688563 - Flags: review?(robert.sajdok)
Attachment #8688563 - Flags: review+
Attachment #8688563 - Flags: review?(robert.sajdok) → review+
Thanks, merged in https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/bzlite/commit/9c571afdbca057828763acb1b15bf5abaef8cde9
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: