Josh Cheng [:josh] Reporter
	Description • 9 years ago

UX spec for First time experience (including FxA)

	Tori Chen [:tori]
	Comment 1 • 9 years ago

Is FTU refinement in v2.5 scope?

	Sam Foster [:sfoster] (he/him)
	Comment 2 • 9 years ago

I would love to see the FTE for TV and talk about maybe converging or at least aligning with gaia/phone FTE. Where does this code live? I dont see anything obvious in tv_apps/. And if we're talking about a completely separate codebase we should probably have a distinct component for it.

	Josh Cheng [:josh] Reporter
	Comment 4 • 9 years ago

(In reply to Tori Chen [:tori] from comment #1)
> Is FTU refinement in v2.5 scope?

Yes, we need your help for fetching following from current smartphone:
- FxAccount login promotion
- User consent on metrics features

We would need additional review for 'User consent' statement for TV.
Thanks!

	Josh Cheng [:josh] Reporter
	Comment 5 • 9 years ago

(In reply to Sam Foster [:sfoster] from comment #2)
> I would love to see the FTE for TV and talk about maybe converging or at
> least aligning with gaia/phone FTE. Where does this code live? I dont see
> anything obvious in tv_apps/. And if we're talking about a completely
> separate codebase we should probably have a distinct component for it.

Hi Sam,
There is currently no FTU for TV in our repo and if we do, it should live under tv_apps/.
It would be same code base with same component. 

Partner implemented the FTU for 2015 model with our UX spec. We have their code but not yet merge back to our repo. 

We plan to implement FTU for 2016 in our repo base on their code with new features in 2.5 includes Seamless experience, Remote control and FxA. The estimated work should be limited.

Currently UX spec is targeting mid Oct and we are still shortage in Gaia developer for implement it before RA.
Will you interest in helping this on TV if you still have bandwidth? :)

	Sam Foster [:sfoster] (he/him)
	Comment 6 • 9 years ago

> Currently UX spec is targeting mid Oct and we are still shortage in Gaia
> developer for implement it before RA.
> Will you interest in helping this on TV if you still have bandwidth? :)

I'd like to be involved, yes. But starting from 0 and having it finished by RA (Nov 2?) isn't realistic for me with my other commitments for 2.5. I guess I would need to see the partner's implementation and better understand the plans. Also, I've not worked on this device and currently have no access to one. So maybe it makes more sense to have the project lead by someone in Taipei and I'll help out?

	Josh Cheng [:josh] Reporter
	Comment 7 • 9 years ago

Hi Sam,
The UX spec for previous FTU is here: http://bit.ly/1V6tSJX
I will keep you update when we have new Spec for 2.5.

The plan for 2.5 is just to add 2 or 3 pages with new features with minimum effort.
I will check this with Evelyn and get back to you about how to get you invlived. Thanks!

	Jack Lin[:jacklin] Assignee
	Comment 8 • 9 years ago

Hi Sam,
Attached is FTE spec.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Thank you.

	Sam Foster [:sfoster] (he/him)
	Comment 9 • 9 years ago

(In reply to Jack Lin[:jacklin] from comment #8)
> Created attachment 8681868 [details]
> FTE Spec.pdf

Interesting. I think the per-feature / in-context tutorial is the direction we want to go for the phone FTU as well. I don't know if it makes sense for each app to implement their own FTU hooks and tutorial, or make this a system-provided facility. I'm not currently familiar enough with this codebase to know if the features here are homescreen or system app or something else, and what the implications would be for implementation.

For the data privacy screens, I'm a little worried that terms like "in aggregate" and "analytics" are too technical and may be meaningless - and possibly scary - for the end-user?

	Jack Lin[:jacklin] Assignee
	Comment 10 • 9 years ago

Hi Sam,

The privacy page is from phone's FTE. I think our legal team has confirmed these words. I am not sure if we can modify it? Or can we suggest?

	Sam Foster [:sfoster] (he/him)
	Comment 11 • 9 years ago

(In reply to Jack Lin[:jacklin] from comment #10)
> The privacy page is from phone's FTE. I think our legal team has confirmed
> these words. I am not sure if we can modify it? Or can we suggest?

You're right. If it worked for the phone FTU it should work here. I know there was quite a lot of discussion about how to make this concise and informative at the same time. The linked Privacy Notice page on mozilla.org does a better job of clarifying what is being sent and how it will be used. I guess that's a reasonable trade-off of space vs. information.

	Tori Chen [:tori]
	Comment 13 • 9 years ago

clear the ni? since Jack is the UX for FTE.

	Josh Cheng [:josh] Reporter
	Comment 14 • 9 years ago

Hi Jack,
Please update the spec and provide the spec here. Thanks!

	Jack Lin[:jacklin] Assignee
	Comment 15 • 9 years ago

Hi Josh,

Please find the latest spec (v2.1) as below link,
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B5RN80W56Ga9fjlncXJuZW5YbW0zX2tDX0sta3FsMXU3cmRYM0hTOEJXZFZ2ck5wSW1PZlU

"User data collection" page (Metrics) is in the process of getting confirmed.
Thank you

	Jack Lin[:jacklin] Assignee
	Comment 16 • 9 years ago

Hi Josh,

Please find the latest spec (v2.2) as below link,
https://drive.google.com/drive/u/0/folders/0B5RN80W56Ga9fjlncXJuZW5YbW0zX2tDX0sta3FsMXU3cmRYM0hTOEJXZFZ2ck5wSW1PZlU

1. "User data collection" page (Metrics) is in the process of getting confirmed.
2. Add "Send to TV" offline page P.28
 
Thank you