Closed
Bug 121297
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Attachment with format=flowed is displayed with <div>
Categories
(MailNews Core :: MIME, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: kazhik, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs)
Details
Attachment with format=flowed is displayed with <div>.
------=_NextPart_000_7502_1a3f_c07
Content-Type: text/plain; name="NIFBERRY.cgl"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NIFBERRY.cgl"
If you doubleclick this attachment, the content is displayed with:
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
mail file for test:
http://bugzilla.mozilla.gr.jp/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=501
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
I am surprised that hotmail.com is using format=flowed
for plain text mail. You can re-create this problem
by doing the following:
1. Access your hotmail.com account.
2. Start composing a mail message to yourself.
3. Attach a plain text file, .txt type, to this message and send it out.
4. Receive this message with Mozilla.
5. Try to see the attached plain text file by double-cliking on the
attached file icon or save this file as a .txt file.
In either situstion at step 5, you will the extraneous
line that does not exist in the file:
<div class="moz-text-flowed" style="font-family: -moz-fixed">
I guess we have not built in a logic to deal with MIME part headers
for attachments which contain format=flowed attribute like the
following typical Hotmail MIME structure:
------=_NextPart_000_7502_1a3f_c07
Content-Type: text/plain; name="testfile.txt"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="testfile.txt"
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla1.2beta
QA Contact: trix → stephend
Comment 3•21 years ago
|
||
I guess the save routine drives libmime with the wrong parameters. It should
call it in save mode. Either that or the f=f converter doesn't honor the save
mode in that case.
Updated•20 years ago
|
Product: MailNews → Core
Comment 4•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 209057 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5•20 years ago
|
||
I integrated the sample messages from this bug and from the dupe into my mail,
and was able to save the files without seeing the <div> mentioned or any
apparent wrapping.
=> WFM
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 6•20 years ago
|
||
I have to reopen this -- I was mistaken. The dupe is about saving the
attachment to disk, and this bug is about viewing the file. When I originally
tested the other day, I am *quite sure* that I was not seeing the <div>, on
saving or on viewing (opening into the default text editor, from TB) -- but it's
definitely there now.
I did, just before re-checking this problem, do something to tweak the
text/plain settings in my mimeTypes.rdf file, so I'll play with that some more
and report back if I can figure out how to prevent the <div>, as was happening
for me before.
Note that currently Apple Mail apparently will send out little, empty parts
typed as text/plain;f=f -- these are placed interstitially to a bunch of
binary attachments in an email (at least, I just saw a message so composed).
Opening these little Part1.x items results in a window containing only the
<div></div> tags.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WORKSFORME → ---
Target Milestone: mozilla1.2beta → ---
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 228002 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #5)
> (..) was able to save the files without seeing the <div> mentioned or any
> apparent wrapping.
Note: I found that, at least with Mozilla 1.7.8 under WinXP, the files are only
packed in <div>..</div>s if you have View->Display Attachments Inline checked.
From messages where attachments are not shown inline, they can be saved correctly.
Pim
Comment 9•19 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #8)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > (..) was able to save the files without seeing the <div> mentioned or any
> > apparent wrapping.
>
> Note: I found that, at least with Mozilla 1.7.8 under WinXP, the files are
> only packed in <div>..</div>s if you have View->Display Attachments Inline
> checked. From messages where attachments are not shown inline, they can be
> saved correctly.
Confirmed. Thanks for the hint!
Comment 10•16 years ago
|
||
I get this when replying to attachments.version 2.0.0.14 (20080421)
Updated•16 years ago
|
Assignee: ducarroz → nobody
Status: REOPENED → NEW
QA Contact: stephend → mime
Assignee | ||
Updated•16 years ago
|
Product: Core → MailNews Core
Comment 12•15 years ago
|
||
Using attached testcase ( in comment #1 ) and based on comment #8, I can't reproduce this issue (both when is display attachments inline off\on).
Someone can confirm that is WFM?.. or I'm wrong?
Comment 13•15 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #12)
> Using attached testcase ( in comment #1 ) and based on comment #8, I can't
> reproduce this issue (both when is display attachments inline off\on).
>
> Someone can confirm that is WFM?.. or I'm wrong?
Test based on
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4pre) Gecko/20100412 Lightning/1.0b2pre Lanikai/3.1b2pre ID:20100412031836
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to [:Aureliano Buendía] from comment #12)
> Using attached testcase ( in comment #1 ) and based on comment #8, I can't
> reproduce this issue (both when is display attachments inline off\on).
> Someone can confirm that is WFM?.. or I'm wrong?
Thank you, Aureliano! You are right.
-> wfm
I tested with TB12.0.1 on WinXP, both for "viewing" (open with Editor directly from TB, which requires prior saving anyway), and "saving" (then viewing with Editor):
* http://bugzilla.mozilla.gr.jp/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=501 (of comment 1)
* attachment 125426 [details] of duplicate bug 209057
Everything works as expected for format=flowed, no extra <div> tags added anywhere.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 20 years ago → 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•