Closed
Bug 1230612
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
2-4% Linux 64/Win* tp5o_scroll regression on Mozilla-Inbound (v.45) on December 03, 2015 from push 462a51797af1
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Animation, defect)
Core
DOM: Animation
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1230448
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox45 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: jmaher, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: perf, regression, Whiteboard: [talos_regression])
Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from your commit 462a51797af1901934d422606a6a090cdb96bab0 in bug 1226118. We need you to address this regression.
This is a list of all known regressions and improvements related to your bug:
http://alertmanager.allizom.org:8080/alerts.html?rev=462a51797af1901934d422606a6a090cdb96bab0&showAll=1
On the page above you can see Talos alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.
To learn more about the regressing test, please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests#tp5o_scroll
Reproducing and debugging the regression:
If you would like to re-run this Talos test on a potential fix, use try with the following syntax:
try: -b o -p linux64,win64,win32 -u none -t g1,g1-e10s # add "mozharness: --spsProfile" to generate profile data
To run the test locally and do a more in-depth investigation, first set up a local Talos environment:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running#Running_locally_-_Source_Code
Then run the following command from the directory where you set up Talos:
talos --develop -e <path>/firefox -a tp5o_scroll
Making a decision:
As the patch author we need your feedback to help us handle this regression.
*** Please let us know your plans by Monday, or the offending patch will be backed out! ***
Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations:
https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
in fact in compare view I found a few others which are suspect:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/compare?originalProject=mozilla-inbound&originalRevision=f3741d47fb6b&newProject=mozilla-inbound&newRevision=462a51797af1&showOnlyConfident=1
specifically all the tp5o scroll tests, and tsvg opacity:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/graphs?timerange=604800&series=[mozilla-inbound,505e97c4c50669524afd8d210471ceddf62cfe2a,1]&highlightedRevisions=f3741d47fb6b&highlightedRevisions=462a51797af1
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
I have done a lot of retriggers on all the jobs to boost confidence in the regressions. It looks like :birtles is aware of this already (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1226118#c50) :)
:birtles, can you help us understand what is going on here and don't be shy to ask questions :) There are a lot of patches, I can bisect them on try if each is atomic.
Flags: needinfo?(bbirtles)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
I'm looking into this in bug 1230448.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(bbirtles)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•