Closed
Bug 125657
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 22 years ago
Error of "redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load the requested page"
Categories
(Core :: Networking: HTTP, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: asensi2, Assigned: darin.moz)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; WinNT4.0; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204
BuildID: 2002020406
Trying to load www.misag.com says: "redirection limit for this URL exceeded.
Unable to load the requested page" and stops. With Internet Exploter it loads
flawlessly
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Load www.misag.com
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
dupe of bug 114709 or bug 115252 ?
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
I'm marking this as a dupicate of bug 115252. Although the bug is
fixed, discussion there indicates that there might have been profile
corruption (comment 56) before the fix landed.
I was unable to replicate your problem using 2002021303 Win2K.
If you can replicate this with a new profile, please reopen.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 115252 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•22 years ago
|
||
I've tried again www.misag.com with Mozilla 1.1 and I have the same results "redirection limit for this URL exceeded. Unable to load the requested page". I have discovered this is trying with cookies not enabled.
Trying to connecto to www.misag.com the results are:
- with wget (without cookies), it leads to http://www.misag.com/?csok=1 (and wget has no cookies)
- with IE (without cookies), it leads to http://www.misag.com/?csok=11
- with Mozilla (without cookies), it shows the infamous error
- with Mozilla (cookies enabled), it leads to http://www.misag.com/?csok=1.
It is very strange that it works with that two programs (without cookies) and NOT Mozilla. Maybe it is a bug lurking there and we should be sure.
Status: VERIFIED → UNCONFIRMED
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
I've been getting this same "redirection" error in Mozilla also, if I try to
reach https://panel.dreamhost.com/ using my home computer, which is running
Win95 on a modem. It loads correctly in IE5.5 on this same computer. I'm using
2002100108, but this has been a problem for some time--I just didn't realize it
might be a Mozilla bug at first..
On the other hand, I have no problem contacting this URL using an earlier build
of Mozilla today from my work computer (Win98/T-1 connection).
I asked the folks at dreamhost.com if they were aware of any errors before
reporting this (they weren't).
I'm quite sure that I used to be able to reach this URL using Mozilla on Win95 a
month or two ago, but I don't go there often enough to have noticed exactly when
it stopped working.
Antonio: Can you please try a newer build? I think that bug 173147 may have
fixed this problem. If so please resolve as WORKSFORME.
Comment 7•22 years ago
|
||
I just ran accross this today with
Mozilla 1.3a, Build ID: 2002112208
At URL: www.ask.com
It appears *any* search gives the error. Eg: "perl help"
I'm on Win2k.
Comment 8•22 years ago
|
||
hmm. to networking: http, but it might be wontfix, given that the dialog now
mentions that the problem might be due to cookies missing... unless there is
really a bug lurking here...
Assignee: asa → darin
Component: Browser-General → Networking: HTTP
QA Contact: doron → httpqa
I have the same problem using either Mozilla 1.0 or 1.2.1 when I want to access
my email account on imp.free.fr
(IMP is a web based email client used by the (big) french internet provider free.fr)
I want to run many sessions of imp.free.fr as I want to check many of my emails
account at the same time, so I need to disable cookies, the session ID is then
added to the URL, and this may cause the problem. This box "Redirection limit
for this URL exceeded. Unable to load the requested page." is popping up 3
times, I suppose for each frame.
The URL of the main window (its MAIN FRAME is loading ok) is like:
http://imp.free.fr/index.php3?HordeSession=27a3c4f0baf4c1dc6d2f5632444c477f
The URL of the TOP FRAME (not loaded unless i reload the frame) is like:
http://imp.free.fr/status.php3?uniq=11398028753def5660166ac&HordeSession=27a3c4f0baf4c1dc6d2f5632444c477f
The URL of the LEFT FRAME (not loaded unless i reload the frame) is like:
http://imp.free.fr/menu.php3?uniq=8352554163def56601b74a&HordeSession=27a3c4f0baf4c1dc6d2f5632444c477f
to test this just go to http://imp.free.fr/
with your cookies disabled.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
seb: the point is that disabling cookies causes this "bug", and there is nothing
we can do about it short of trying to better inform users of the problem.
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
marking WONTFIX then per previous discussion
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago → 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 13•20 years ago
|
||
(In reply to comment #10)
> the point is that disabling cookies causes this "bug", and there is nothing
> we can do about it short of trying to better inform users of the problem.
The thing is that when I open the same pages in IE with the same cookies
blocked, things still work fine. Case in point... click on a link to the movie
reviews from http://www.nytimes.com/, which will send you to
http://movies2.nytimes.com/. Now if cookies for movies2 are blocked in Mozilla
you will end up in a redirection loop. In IE, you get sent to:
http://www.nytimes.com/auth/login?URI=http://movies2.nytimes.com/<insert rest of
original URL here>.
IE manages to do it. Why can't Mozilla? Can we reopen this?
The other problem is that there is no hint as to which cookies are causing the
problem. It would be much more useful if, instead of a message box saying that
cookies can cause the problem, there was actually a list of blocked cookies that
you can unblock.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•20 years ago
|
||
Mozilla accepts cookies by default. Therefore, the number of users impacted by
this is relatively small. Moreover, the users who modify this setting likely
understand what a cookie is. I agree with you that it would be nice to have
more detailed information about the blocked cookies that possibly to blame, but
I have to say that that is probably a low-priority item. Of course, if someone
wanted to work on a patch for that, I wouldn't object ;-)
As for why IE behaves differently... I cannot say. Someone should gather
network traces and compare the HTTP requests sent by IE and Mozilla.
I'd suggest that you file a new bug with the information you have provided here
on www.nytimes.com. Thanks!
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•