Rainer Bielefeld Reporter
	Description • 8 years ago

Link behind "SeaMonkey End-User License Agreement" to <https://www.mozilla.org/de/legal/eula/seamonkey-en.html> shows "Error 404"

	Rainer Bielefeld Reporter
	Comment 1 • 8 years ago

Also see "Bug 1004442 Legal page talks about tri-license instead of MPL2"

	Philip Chee
	Comment 2 • 8 years ago

We don't have a EULA any more. Who can remove that link? Frank? Jens?

	Pankaj Garg Assignee
	Comment 3 • 6 years ago

(In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #1)
> Also see "Bug 1004442 Legal page talks about tri-license instead of MPL2"

Hi Rainer,
I have the following doubts:
Is it not redirecting to MPL2.0 license page now on clicking the tri-lecense link?
I can remove the EULA section from the page.

Tell me exactly what are the changes required to do?

Thanks.

	Rainer Bielefeld Reporter
	Comment 4 • 6 years ago

(In reply to Pankaj Garg from comment #3)
> Tell me exactly what are the changes required to do?

I can't. I only found the dead link.

But I know:
My WIN Package for SM 2.53 contains a file "license.txt", which contains "Mozilla Public License Version 2.0"

My opinion:
End user License is something different from Source Licenses.

As you see on <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/eula/> the EULA contains "Mozilla Public License Version 2.0" and additionally (for example) "End-User Software License Agreement" <https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/eula/firefox-3/>.I haven't a clue where we do have a WM-Eula. I only know <https://www-archive.mozilla.org/legal/eula/seamonkey-en.html> (for SM1?), which does not load for me currently.

I will have a look when this page will work again.

	Rainer Bielefeld Reporter
	Comment 5 • 6 years ago

(In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #4)
> I will have a look when this page will work again.

Well, "Last modified January 11, 2007", I doubt that we should link to that one. I haven't a clue what SM-EULA might be.

May be Status Meeting can help?

	Pankaj Garg Assignee
	Comment 6 • 6 years ago

(In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #5)
> (In reply to Rainer Bielefeld from comment #4)
> > I will have a look when this page will work again.
> 
> Well, "Last modified January 11, 2007", I doubt that we should link to that
> one. I haven't a clue what SM-EULA might be.
Is there any update on this issue?
> 
> May be Status Meeting can help?

	Robert Kaiser
	Comment 7 • 6 years ago

https://www-archive.mozilla.org/legal/eula/seamonkey-en.html was the EULA but as with Firefox and Thunderbird, the same as stated in https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/legal/eula/ is AFAIK true for SeaMonkey, including "There is no separate End User License Agreement (EULA)."

	Frank-Rainer Grahl (:frg)
	Comment 8 • 6 years ago

I agree. Sounds like this just needs some rewording and the link changed to the "Mozilla Foundation End-User Licensing Agreements".

Maybe to keep it short just?

The SeaMonkey release packages and other binaries are released under the Mozilla Foundation End-User Licensing Agreements.