Closed
Bug 1285529
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
B2G build broken: client.mk:114: *** missing separator. Stop.
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1278990
People
(Reporter: gerard-majax, Assigned: gerard-majax)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files, 2 obsolete files)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Adding $(info MOZCONFIG_CONTENT=$(MOZCONFIG_CONTENT)) on line 114 gives this. I'm a bit worried about the part referring to errors.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Local revert of bug 1278990 and the issue is gone ...
Blocks: 1278990
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
I'm looking at my changes to mozconfig.cache now to see what could be causing this. Prime suspect, from an instinct perspective, is the wget call... https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/build/mozconfig.cache#49
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63158/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63158/
Attachment #8769181 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=3ac4aa3be670
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769181 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen) → review+
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769181 [details] Bug 1285529 - Do not set SCCACHE when CCACHE_DIR is there https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63158/#review60018 win32,win64 still get their sccache config so lgtm.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Not good, it is still failing.
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63184/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63184/
Attachment #8769216 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen)
Attachment #8769217 -
Flags: review?(lissyx+mozillians)
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63186/diff/#index_header See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63186/
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769181 [details] Bug 1285529 - Do not set SCCACHE when CCACHE_DIR is there Review request updated; see interdiff: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63158/diff/1-2/
Attachment #8769181 -
Attachment description: Bug 1285529 - Ensure wget failure do not break us → Bug 1285529 - Do not set SCCACHE when CCACHE_DIR is there
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8769216 [details] Bug 1285529 - Ensure wget failure do not break us https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/63184/#review60026
Attachment #8769216 -
Flags: review?(rthijssen) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769216 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8769217 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8769217 -
Flags: review?(lissyx+mozillians)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•8 years ago
|
||
Green! https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=97a66fdb0fa0&filter-tier=1&filter-tier=2&filter-tier=3&selectedJob=23560679
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed by alissy@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ae11e3061f5b Do not set SCCACHE when CCACHE_DIR is there r=grenade
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
Pushed by kwierso@gmail.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/751186781016 Backed out changeset ae11e3061f5b to allow me to do a merge, relanding later https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/d5d91aa3a430 Do not set SCCACHE when CCACHE_DIR is there r=grenade CLOSED TREE
So, I backed this out to fix up a merge conflict that popped up when trying to merge m-c to autoland today. I then did the merge and relanded this patch to autoland after the conflict was dealt with. Then I realized that the conflict was caused by my backout from bug 1278990, and this patch's changes were only to the chunk of the file 1278990's patch added, so that whole chunk should be removed again. Re-backed out in https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/0215f0988f9c
Flags: needinfo?(lissyx+mozillians)
So I guess this patch should just be folded into the patch from bug 1278990's patch when it re-lands?
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Wes Kocher (:KWierso) from comment #16) > So I guess this patch should just be folded into the patch from bug > 1278990's patch when it re-lands? Looking at the reasons of the backout, it is possible that this bug explicitely fixes this problem :/
Flags: needinfo?(lissyx+mozillians)
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•8 years ago
|
||
Marking as dupe since bug 1278990 will integrate those fixes.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•