Unified autocomplete/autofill "Visit" row should show the page title if it is in the history or bookmark
Categories
(Firefox :: Address Bar, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
()
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox103 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: emk, Assigned: daisuke)
References
Details
(Keywords: papercut, Whiteboard: [fxsearch][snt-triaged][search-urlbar])
Attachments
(4 files)
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Updated•8 years ago
|
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Updated•4 years ago
|
Comment 5•3 years ago
|
||
May be related to autofilling full URLs, not only origins, since currently autofill fills only origins. May also need UX input.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•2 years ago
|
||
I tried to show the title. I attached the screenshot.
I thought it looked a bit confusing, because the "Visit" label and the title got mixed.
Next, I will attach another screenshot without the Visit label.
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•2 years ago
|
||
This one seems simpler and easier to understand at least for me.
What do you think? As Drew said, we may better ask UX team.
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•2 years ago
|
||
But, if we choose the above, how about the page not visited yet.
Will we show "URL - Visit" as the same as now?
It may make confusion a bit since there may be pages whose title is “Visit”.
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
Thanks for testing these Daisuke. I agree with Masatoshi -- of the two options, without "Visit" is better. However, it's interesting because the screenshot in comment 7 shows the URL and title in the opposite places they usually are. Of course it makes sense because it's an autofill result, and autofill results show their URL first. But I wonder if it should be styled like a typical history result when a title is available.
So instead of this:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ -- Bugzilla Main Page
Do this:
Bugzilla Main Page -- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
What do you think? Could you try that please and see how it looks? We should probably get Ryan's and/or Henry's opinion too.
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•2 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•2 years ago
|
||
I attached a screenshot that shows the title first.
This also looks good!
One point of concern is when the URL has not yet been visited.
Perhaps the following suggestions could be chosen:
- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ - Visit (current implementation)
- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
In either case, the position that shows URL will be changed like Title - URL
(visited) or URL - Visit
(not visited yet).
There may be some discomfort with the change in location?
As you said, I'll ask Ryan as well.
Comment 13•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Daisuke Akatsuka (:daisuke) from comment #12)
I attached a screenshot that shows the title first.
This also looks good!One point of concern is when the URL has not yet been visited.
Perhaps the following suggestions could be chosen:
- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ - Visit (current implementation)
- http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/
In either case, the position that shows URL will be changed like
Title - URL
(visited) orURL - Visit
(not visited yet).
There may be some discomfort with the change in location?As you said, I'll ask Ryan as well.
Thanks @Daisuke, some thoughts below:
I also like the latest iteration on order with "title" : "url-string"
- More consistent with suggestions below (Drew's point)
- I think the title is more "human" (more legible, easier to scan) than a URL
In the case of a not yet visited URL - I think having the "-Visit" appended still makes sense as it offers context for the user as to the action to take/why they are being shown this URL. My concern otherwise is that without that context it could be confusing as to why it's shown, especially if a user has never visited said URL before.
I do think we should get Product (Henry) buy-in on this as well.
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•2 years ago
|
||
Thank you very much for your clear answer, Ryan!
I'll ask Henry as well.
Hello Henry!
There is the idea that shows the page title for the autofill result row.
Could you please confirm the way to display the information?
Thanks!
Comment 15•2 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Daisuke Akatsuka (:daisuke) from comment #14)
Thank you very much for your clear answer, Ryan!
I'll ask Henry as well.Hello Henry!
There is the idea that shows the page title for the autofill result row.
Could you please confirm the way to display the information?
Thanks!
I agree with the last agreed iteration with Ryan & Drew's input above. Also lets monitor feedback from users to measure the impact. Thanks.
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•2 years ago
|
||
Thank you very much, Henry!
I will proceed with this.
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•2 years ago
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 18•2 years ago
|
||
Comment 19•2 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Updated•2 years ago
|
Description
•