Closed Bug 1303330 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

2.11 - 2.23% cart (linux64) regression on push fea76c9b016b3175f93aacd68e4f095906bb9c7c (Thu Sep 15 2016)

Categories

(Firefox :: Theme, defect)

51 Branch
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox48 --- unaffected
firefox49 --- unaffected
firefox50 --- unaffected
firefox51 --- affected

People

(Reporter: jmaher, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: perf, regression, talos-regression)

Talos has detected a Firefox performance regression from push fea76c9b016b3175f93aacd68e4f095906bb9c7c. As author of one of the patches included in that push, we need your help to address this regression.

Regressions:

  2%  cart summary linux64 opt          30.93 -> 31.62
  2%  cart summary linux64 opt e10s     32.9 -> 33.6


You can find links to graphs and comparison views for each of the above tests at: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/alerts?id=3177

On the page above you can see an alert for each affected platform as well as a link to a graph showing the history of scores for this test. There is also a link to a treeherder page showing the Talos jobs in a pushlog format.

To learn more about the regressing test(s), please see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Tests

For information on reproducing and debugging the regression, either on try or locally, see: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/Running

*** Please let us know your plans within 3 business days, or the offending patch(es) will be backed out! ***

Our wiki page outlines the common responses and expectations: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Buildbot/Talos/RegressionBugsHandling
Component: Untriaged → Theme
Version: 49 Branch → 51 Branch
here is a compare view of the non-e10s:
https://treeherder.mozilla.org/perf.html#/comparesubtest?originalProject=mozilla-inbound&originalRevision=66b76839f96ac8651d5a43bd410c08625770184d&newProject=mozilla-inbound&newRevision=fea76c9b016b3175f93aacd68e4f095906bb9c7c&originalSignature=5470dd119f529e9cc4ca90863bb3950b11ae265f&newSignature=5470dd119f529e9cc4ca90863bb3950b11ae265f&framework=1

the 3 regressed:
cart 3-customize-enter-css.half.TART opt
cart 3-customize-enter-css.all.TART opt
cart 2-customize-exit.error.TART opt

:dao, can you look into this and determine if this is something we should fix or accept?
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
The patch that landed was fairly simple. I bet the regression comes from the buttons at the bottom now being rendered natively. Either that or it must be CSS variable overhead (but then it shouldn't be Linux-only). Either way I think we need to accept the regression.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(dao+bmo)
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.