Closed
Bug 1350566
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Crash in mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::AssertWorkerThread | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::CxxStackFrame::CxxStackFrame | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox55 | --- | wontfix |
firefox56 | --- | wontfix |
firefox57 | --- | wontfix |
firefox58 | --- | unaffected |
firefox59 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: calixte, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, Whiteboard: [clouseau])
Crash Data
This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is
report bp-1e5f3fc5-053f-4ae6-9a3c-03b132170325.
=============================================================
There are 2 crashes on nightly 55 with buildid 20170324030205. In analyzing the backtrace, the regression may have been introduced by patch [1] to fix bug 1342863.
[1] https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev?node=2f76caec4138c58f2be6314e9d41b58f7a5cb06e
Flags: needinfo?(kuoe0)
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Hi Bevis, I read the crash report. It crashed on `MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT(mWorkerLoopID == MessageLoop::current()->id()) (not on worker thread!)`.
In my patch[1], I replaced `NS_DispatchToMainThread()` by `mDocument->Dispatch()`. AFAIK, `nsDocument::Dispatch()` also dispatches event to the main thread. Do you know any case make it dispatch to the wrong thread?
[1]: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev?node=2f76caec4138c58f2be6314e9d41b58f7a5cb06e
Flags: needinfo?(btseng)
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
No, nsDocument::Dispatch() always dispatch the runnables to the main thread:
http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/xpcom/threads/Dispatcher.cpp#129-133
From the call stack, it seems that the "ZoomConstraintsClient::RefreshZoomConstraints" was called directly by mozilla::PresShell::ResizeReflow() instead of the runnable you dispatched in bug 1342863.
It's more likely that the call sequence of PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints() was triggered from an unexpected thread instead.
Flags: needinfo?(btseng)
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
I'm fairly sure this isn't actually a threading problem, but the IPC channel is getting closed. That AssertWorkerThread function is just how it manifests.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Crash Signature: [@ mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::AssertWorkerThread | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::CxxStackFrame::CxxStackFrame | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints] → [@ mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::AssertWorkerThread | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::CxxStackFrame::CxxStackFrame | mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints]
[@ mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Se…
Version: 52 Branch → Trunk
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Per the discussion in bug 1415610 this is probably happening as a result of GPU process crashes. As such we shouldn't be crashing the content process but should recover gracefully from this scenario. Either mApzcTreeManager in TabChild needs to be nulled out as a result of the GPU process crash handling, or we should be checking to see if the IPC channel is still ok before sending.
Updated•7 years ago
|
status-firefox56:
--- → affected
status-firefox57:
--- → affected
status-firefox58:
--- → affected
OS: Windows 8 → All
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Jim what is the next step on this to follow up on comment 6?
Flags: needinfo?(jmathies)
Updated•7 years ago
|
Crash Signature: mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints ] → mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints ]
[@ mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::Send | mozilla::layers::PAPZCTreeManagerChild::SendUpdateZoomConstraints ]
status-firefox59:
--- → affected
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Julien Cristau [:jcristau] from comment #7)
> Jim what is the next step on this to follow up on comment 6?
We'll try to find some time to work on this. This is very low volume btw.
Flags: needinfo?(jmathies)
Priority: -- → P3
It looks like this was fixed or the signatures shifted, as there aren't any crashes showing up past Firefox 57.0.2.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•