Honza Bambas (:mayhemer) Assignee
	Description • 8 years ago

One of active/background tabs prioritization bugs.

This would serve following purposes:
- give more bandwidth to the active tab
- preserve parallelism for background tabs
- lower CPU load for background tabs as parsers/decoders would get smaller chunks in longer intervals

	Ben Kelly [:bkelly, not reviewing]
	Comment 1 • 8 years ago

Will this increase the priority of a channel started while the tab is in the background, but then focused before the channel completes?

	Honza Bambas (:mayhemer) Assignee
	Comment 2 • 8 years ago

Implementation notes:
- read small piece of data from a background socket
- call ResumeRecv() using a hearbeat timer (one for all is OK)

	Honza Bambas (:mayhemer) Assignee
	Comment 3 • 8 years ago

(In reply to Ben Kelly [not reviewing due to deadline][:bkelly] from comment #1)
> Will this increase the priority of a channel started while the tab is in the
> background, but then focused before the channel completes?

yes, definitely.