Closed Bug 1361986 Opened 8 years ago Closed 8 years ago

Implement photon design for about:privatebrowsing

Categories

(Firefox :: Theme, defect, P1)

defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED FIXED
Firefox 55
Iteration:
55.5 - May 15
Tracking Status
firefox55 --- verified

People

(Reporter: dao, Assigned: dao)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

(Whiteboard: [photon-visual][p2])

Attachments

(2 files)

Summary: about:privatebrowsing design update → Implement photon design for about:privatebrowsing
Flags: qe-verify+
Iteration: --- → 55.5 - May 15
Priority: -- → P1
QA Contact: brindusa.tot
Comment on attachment 8864447 [details] Bug 1361986 - Update the about:privatebrowsing design for photon. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/136132/#review139204 r=me with the overflow fixed. Also please note that the general font weight seems a bit too bold on my machine (especially compared with the mockups), but that's something we can also refine later on. ::: browser/themes/shared/privatebrowsing/aboutPrivateBrowsing.css:14 (Diff revision 1) > } > > html.private { > - --in-content-page-color: #beb8cc; > - --in-content-text-color: #beb8cc; > - --in-content-page-background: #1c023c; > + --in-content-page-color: white; > + --in-content-text-color: white; > + --in-content-page-background: #25003e; Are we not defining CSS variables for colors anymore? ::: toolkit/themes/shared/in-content/info-pages.inc.css (Diff revision 1) > flex-direction: column; > box-sizing: border-box; > min-height: 100vh; > - padding-top: 0; > + padding: 0 48px; > - padding-bottom: 0; > - padding-inline-start: calc(48px + 4.6em); This padding was keeping the icons from overflowing out of the window on small window sizes. We should probably keep it or at least fix the issue.
Attachment #8864447 - Flags: review?(jhofmann) → review+
Comment on attachment 8864447 [details] Bug 1361986 - Update the about:privatebrowsing design for photon. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/136132/#review139204 > Are we not defining CSS variables for colors anymore? Oh, nvm this, I thought I had deleted it but mozreview submitted anyway.
Pushed by dgottwald@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/9267221b3d84 Update the about:privatebrowsing design for photon. r=johannh
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 55
Attached image PB_OnOffTrackingProtectionButton.jpg (deleted) —
Johann, While verifying this on the latest Nightly, 55.0a1, build ID 20170523030206, I noticed that the 'Tracking Protection on/off' slider on the PB page, set to off position, has a different color(brighter) than the one shown in the image from the invisionapp link provided. Please see the attached screenshot. Also, the shape of the ON/OFF slider is a little different - it seems to be shorter and wider. Are these differences intentional?
(In reply to Brindusa Tot[:brindusat] from comment #7) > Created attachment 8870414 [details] > PB_OnOffTrackingProtectionButton.jpg > > Johann, > > While verifying this on the latest Nightly, 55.0a1, build ID 20170523030206, > I noticed that the 'Tracking Protection on/off' slider on the PB page, set > to off position, has a different color(brighter) than the one shown in the > image from the invisionapp link provided. Please see the attached screenshot. > > Also, the shape of the ON/OFF slider is a little different - it seems to be > shorter and wider. > > Are these differences intentional? Not that I know of, we just missed it. Can you make a new bug for making this button look exactly like the mockups please?
> (In reply to Brindusa Tot[:brindusat] from comment #7) > > Created attachment 8870414 [details] > > PB_OnOffTrackingProtectionButton.jpg > > > > Johann, > > > > While verifying this on the latest Nightly, 55.0a1, build ID 20170523030206, > > I noticed that the 'Tracking Protection on/off' slider on the PB page, set > > to off position, has a different color(brighter) than the one shown in the > > image from the invisionapp link provided. Please see the attached screenshot. > > > > Also, the shape of the ON/OFF slider is a little different - it seems to be > > shorter and wider. > > > > Are these differences intentional? > > Not that I know of, we just missed it. Can you make a new bug for making > this button look exactly like the mockups please? Managed to reproduce the issue on an affected build, on Windows 10x64. Firefox 55.0b4, Build ID: 20170622104007 Firefox 56.0a1, Build ID: 20170622030208 I hope now its properly aligned with shape, color, etc in latest version. It looks like the left side image of attachment 8870414 [details]. [Testday - 20170623]
Verified on latest Nightly 56.0a1, on Windows 10 x 64, Mac OS X 10.12 and Ubuntu 16.04 x64. Logged bug 1378799 for the issue described in comment 7.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Flags: qe-verify+
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: