Closed Bug 1392593 Opened 7 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Clearing a website's permission in private window X should not affect the permission status in private window Y and all the other normal windows

Categories

(Firefox :: Site Permissions, defect)

57 Branch
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX
Tracking Status
firefox57 --- affected

People

(Reporter: roxana.leitan, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0 Build ID: 20170821100350 [Affected versions]: Nightly 57.0a1 [Affected platforms]: Windows 10 x64, Mac OS X 10.12 [Steps to reproduce]: 1.Launch Nightly 57.0a1 with a new profile 2.Navigate to youtube.com in normal window 3.Persist the site from step 2 4.Open a private window and navigate to youtube.com 5.Delete storage permissions for youtube.com from private window [Expected results]: The permission status from normal window should not be affected [Actual results]: Storage permission from normal window is removed
I think that works as intended. What makes you think these should be the actual results?
Component: Site Identity and Permission Panels → Device Permissions
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
I added this bug according to comment 8 from bug 1379654.
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
(In reply to Mark Liang(:mark_liang) from bug 1379654 comment #8) > For case 2, I'd say ideally a website's permission status in each private > browsing session is isolated and is inherited from the normal browsing > session. That means, clearing a website's permission in private window X > won't affect the permission status in private window Y and all the other > normal windows. It doesn't work like this right now and changing that is a much larger endeavor worthy of a meta-bug. I'll close this bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Johann, did you file that new bug?
(In reply to Anne (:annevk) from comment #4) > Johann, did you file that new bug? No. Do we even intend to change this? What are the benefits? Is there a team that wants to pick this up? If you feel like this is a pressing issue, feel free to move forward (maybe with a post to dev-platform?), but I don't think there's much I want to do about it.
I'm not aware of any plans, but I think it has some nice properties in that thinks you do "privately" don't affect your day-to-day browsing. Anyway, I just got a little confused with you closing this bug and suggesting a not-filed follow-up bug.
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.