Closed
Bug 1392593
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Clearing a website's permission in private window X should not affect the permission status in private window Y and all the other normal windows
Categories
(Firefox :: Site Permissions, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox57 | --- | affected |
People
(Reporter: roxana.leitan, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:57.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/57.0
Build ID: 20170821100350
[Affected versions]:
Nightly 57.0a1
[Affected platforms]:
Windows 10 x64, Mac OS X 10.12
[Steps to reproduce]:
1.Launch Nightly 57.0a1 with a new profile
2.Navigate to youtube.com in normal window
3.Persist the site from step 2
4.Open a private window and navigate to youtube.com
5.Delete storage permissions for youtube.com from private window
[Expected results]:
The permission status from normal window should not be affected
[Actual results]:
Storage permission from normal window is removed
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
I think that works as intended. What makes you think these should be the actual results?
Component: Site Identity and Permission Panels → Device Permissions
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
I added this bug according to comment 8 from bug 1379654.
Flags: needinfo?(roxana.leitan)
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Mark Liang(:mark_liang) from bug 1379654 comment #8)
> For case 2, I'd say ideally a website's permission status in each private
> browsing session is isolated and is inherited from the normal browsing
> session. That means, clearing a website's permission in private window X
> won't affect the permission status in private window Y and all the other
> normal windows.
It doesn't work like this right now and changing that is a much larger endeavor worthy of a meta-bug. I'll close this bug.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Johann, did you file that new bug?
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Anne (:annevk) from comment #4)
> Johann, did you file that new bug?
No. Do we even intend to change this? What are the benefits? Is there a team that wants to pick this up? If you feel like this is a pressing issue, feel free to move forward (maybe with a post to dev-platform?), but I don't think there's much I want to do about it.
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
I'm not aware of any plans, but I think it has some nice properties in that thinks you do "privately" don't affect your day-to-day browsing. Anyway, I just got a little confused with you closing this bug and suggesting a not-filed follow-up bug.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•