Revocation data for new records

Comment on attachment 8911984 [details] Intermediates to be revoked I confirm that these are the correct entries to add to OneCRL as per Bug #1400600, Bug #1402128, Bug #1402158, and Bug #1402987. Thanks!

Comment on attachment 8911989 [details] revocations_1402977.txt The canary ran with no errors. Note that there is spurious debug info in the beginning of this text file. I had to manually delete it. Can we fix our generation script so that this does not appear?

Adding NeedInfo for... Mark -- see Matt's question in Comment #4 JC -- to verify the corresponding kinto records

(In reply to Matt Wobensmith [:mwobensmith][:matt:] from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 8911989 [details] > revocations_1402977.txt > > The canary ran with no errors. > > Note that there is spurious debug info in the beginning of this text file. I > had to manually delete it. Can we fix our generation script so that this > does not appear? Sure.

Evaluating expected file = 'expected-1402977' Results: Pending Kinto Dataset (Found): 480 Added Entries (Expected): 7 [GOOD] Expected But Not Pending (Not Found): 0 Deleted: 0 [GOOD] Entries In Production But Lost Without Being Deleted (Missing): 0 [GOOD] The Expected file matches the change between the staged Kinto and production. [GOOD] The Kinto dataset found at production equals the union of the expected file and the live list. Nothing not found. Nothing deleted. Looks good here. I will trigger Kinto.

Triggered.

I confirm that these entries have been added to OneCRL. Thanks!