Closed
Bug 140340
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Correct Fragment as specified by Fragment Identifier in URI not always displayed correctly
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: kristoff_batizy, Assigned: attinasi)
References
()
Details
From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020417 BuildID: 2002041711 At http://www.batizy.com/moz-bug/ there is an anomaly where the proper position in the document is not always navigated to when the URI contains a fragment identifier. The links on the left of the page for "Cool Cars","SRT-4","M-80", and "Viper GTS-R(via regular link)" work correctly. But the link on the left of the page for " Viper GTS-R (via dispatcher)" does not work correctly. The correct URI is shown, but not the correct fragment. It's position is off. The difference is that the links which work are direct HREFs, whereas the one that does not work goes through a dispatcher (http://www.batizy.com/moz-bug/helpdispatcher.html) This was originally noticed in a more complex scenario using servlets and jsps, but I have re-created a simpler version here that just uses static html. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: Create a scenario similar to http://www.batizy.com/moz-bug/ and as described above. Actual Results: The correct URI fragment is not shown. Expected Results: The correct URI fragment, as identified by the URI and fragment identifier in the dispatcher, should be shown. It is actually off. The larger the document and the more images in the document, the more off it becomes. The helpdispatcher.html that I am using in this test is: http://www.batizy.com/moz-bug/helpdispatcher.html and contains: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title>Help Dispatcher</title> <meta http-equiv="refresh" content="1; url=main.html#topic-04"> </head> <body> </body> </html>
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•23 years ago
|
||
Looks like it is the same as 126882 which has been marked as a duplicate of 60307. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 60307 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•