Closed
Bug 1431109
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
'*<unknown>.mozilla::StaticAutoPtr<mozilla::SandboxReporter>::mRawPtr' is used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized]
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Core
XPCOM
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla59
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox59 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: Sylvestre, Assigned: Sylvestre)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1430729 +++ There is a second occurrence with gcc 8-20180110-1 In file included from /root/firefox-gcc-last/security/sandbox/linux/reporter/SandboxReporter.h:13, from /root/firefox-gcc-last/security/sandbox/linux/reporter/SandboxReporter.cpp:7: /root/firefox-gcc-last/obj-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/dist/include/mozilla/StaticPtr.h: In constructor 'mozilla::StaticAutoPtr<T>::StaticAutoPtr() [with T = mozilla::SandboxReporter]': /root/firefox-gcc-last/obj-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/dist/include/mozilla/StaticPtr.h:48:17: error: '*<unknown>.mozilla::StaticAutoPtr<mozilla::SandboxReporter>::mRawPtr' is used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=uninitialized] MOZ_ASSERT(!mRawPtr); ^~~~~~~ cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors Not sure if this is a bug in the compiler false positive or not.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8943276 [details] Bug 1431109 - Ignore a second incorrect warning with gcc (-Wuninitialized) https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/213600/#review219322 ::: xpcom/base/StaticPtr.h:51 (Diff revision 1) > StaticAutoPtr() > { > +#ifdef __GNUC__ > +#pragma GCC diagnostic push > +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wuninitialized" > + // False positive with gcc. See bug 1430729 Do we want to reference the `StaticRefPtr` bug here, as written, or do we want to change this to reference this bug? Either option makes sense, I think.
Attachment #8943276 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
I kept the same bug because it is the same issue at the end. When reading at the code, this will avoid the effect "why the same code has two different bugs? Maybe there is a good reason for that" :)
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
WFM!
Pushed by sledru@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/1edfd7219583 Ignore a second incorrect warning with gcc (-Wuninitialized) r=froydnj
Assignee | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
status-firefox59:
--- → affected
status-firefox60:
affected → ---
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/1edfd7219583
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla59
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•