Closed Bug 144977 Opened 22 years ago Closed 22 years ago

Categories

(Core Graveyard :: Plug-ins, defect)

x86
Linux
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

(Not tracked)

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 124006

People

(Reporter: demiurg, Assigned: srgchrpv)

References

()

Details

(Keywords: crash, stackwanted)

From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0rc2) Gecko/20020513 BuildID: 2002051323 Just crash. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: go to the URL
There is a little flash based naviation widget at the bottom of that url Reporter: Do you have flash installed? If yes: Version? And: Are you running mozilla on a remote display?
Shockwave Flash File name: /usr/lib/netscape/plugins/libflashplayer.so Shockwave Flash 4.0 r12 Mime Type Description Suffixes Enabled application/x-shockwave-flash Shockwave Flash swf Yes application/futuresplash FutureSplash Player spl Yes No, local display. Will try with flash 5...
Flash 4 is known to crash, Flash 5 is recommended and should work fine.
Assignee: Matti → beppe
Component: Browser-General → Plug-ins
Keywords: crash, stackwanted
QA Contact: imajes-qa → shrir
No luck with flash 5. Crash...
there's been a few other crashes reported on linux lately, pages containing flash. Not sure there's a pattern here. Bug 144567, bug 144620 Reporter: If you can provide a talkback ID, that would be fine.
Sorry, the talkback thing will have to wait a few days - if I get it right there is no way to build a talkback-enabled mozilla from src.rpm and I can't download the talkback version right now over my miserable dialup...
no crash on pr1 0512 for me..wfm.
WFM Linux/2002051507 I even browsed around with the flash navigator a bit.
serge: I haven't seen this come across before, do you see any such crash? and didn't the note from the macromedia guy say there was a newer version?
Assignee: beppe → serge
wfm rh7.2 mozilla trunk 20020516
The problem went away after I recompiled the mozilla with gcc 2.96 20000731 (it was originally compiled with gcc 3.0.2 20010905), with target athlon in both cases. Very weird, since gcc 3 is quite stable - I use kernel compiled with gcc 3 without any problem
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 124006 ***
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 22 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
mass duplicate verifications . For filtering purposes, pls use keywd "massdupverification"
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.