Per bug 1463809 comment 10.

Comment on attachment 8988673 [details] Bug 1472105 - Back out changeset e933d5d558ec (bug 1427700) for bug 1463809. Approval Request Comment [Feature/Bug causing the regression]: Bug 1427700 [User impact if declined]: Bug 1463809 [Is this code covered by automated tests?]: No [Has the fix been verified in Nightly?]: Reverts to a known good state [Needs manual test from QE? If yes, steps to reproduce]: No [List of other uplifts needed for the feature/fix]: None [Is the change risky?]: Low risk [Why is the change risky/not risky?]: Reverts to a known good state [String changes made/needed]: None

I've asked Gijs for a rubberstamp, but already requested approval in the meantime since it's a trivial uplift. This should only land in Beta, we're working on bug 1463809 in Nightly.

Comment on attachment 8988673 [details] Bug 1472105 - Back out changeset e933d5d558ec (bug 1427700) for bug 1463809. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/253894/#review260658 rs=me in that this is the correct patch to do a backout, but I don't know anything about this code, or if the cure is worse than the disease here... so I mean, if you wanted buy-in on this backout, I would suggest talking to jhorak or stransky...

Thanks! Yes, this is just a rubberstamp, Jan and I already talked in bug 1463809.

Comment on attachment 8988673 [details] Bug 1472105 - Back out changeset e933d5d558ec (bug 1427700) for bug 1463809. OK, from the discussion in bug 1463809 and gijs's approval I think this is fine to land on mozilla-beta. It should end up in beta 5 early next week.